EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Earth Science
Published
This submission belongs to the session S5. Natural Hazards and Risk of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Earth Science
Published date
31 Aug, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarRajib Shaw
Citation
Bruno Silva de Jesus, Plan–Operations Gap Analysis for Urban Drainage Risk: Comparing 2026 Service-Order Hotspots with a 2011 Macrodrainage Plan in Guarujá, Brazil, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Earth Science, 2 September–4 September 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Plan–Operations Gap Analysis for Urban Drainage Risk: Comparing 2026 Service-Order Hotspots with a 2011 Macrodrainage Plan in Guarujá, Brazil

Bruno Silva de Jesus 1
1. Secretariat of Urban Services and Operations (Secretaria de Serviços e Operações Urbanas), Municipality of Guarujá (Prefeitura Municipal de Guarujá), Guarujá, São Paulo, 11432-502, Brazil
Abstract

Introduction: Urban flooding risk management depends on aligning long-term drainage planning with day-to-day operational evidence of stormwater system stress. Guarujá (São Paulo, Brazil) has a macrodrainage master plan produced in 2011, while municipal maintenance records continue to register recurrent unclogging interventions across the city. This study proposes a plan–operations comparison framework to assess whether locations showing high recurrence of drainage-related work orders in 2026 are covered by critical points and intervention proposals in the 2011 macrodrainage plan, and to identify recurrent hotspots absent from the plan that may signal post-plan changes in failure patterns.

Methods: We compiled and standardized municipal drainage unclogging work orders (January 2020–February 2026) and built a street-level hotspot ranking. In parallel, we extracted from the 2011 plan its catalog of critical areas, basin references, diagnostics, and proposed structural measures. Hotspots were matched to plan elements using a concordance matrix and classified into four practical categories: (A) planned-but-still-critical; (B) aligned with plan diagnostics but lacking a clear intervention pathway; (C) recurrent hotspots absent from the plan (candidate emerging hotspots); and (D) plan-identified critical points with low current recurrence.

Results: Preliminary results indicate both (i) persistent operational recurrence in areas already highlighted in the plan, suggesting implementation gaps, insufficient mitigation, or maintenance-sensitive mechanisms, and (ii) a set of recurrent hotspots not referenced in the plan, which may warrant targeted field diagnostics and risk-based prioritization.

Conclusions: The framework provides a transparent way to translate operational recurrence into actionable management questions, supporting decisions to execute pending interventions, refine maintenance strategies, and prioritize on-site investigation where planning coverage is missing.

Keywords
urban flood risk
stormwater drainage
drainage maintenance
work orders
hotspot analysis
plan–operations gap
macrodrainage plan
risk-based prioritization
municipal operations
urban resilience
Long-term geomagnetic observations in the Vrancea Seismogenic Zone and their relationship with seismic energy release: The bright and dark sides of statistical correlation
Detecting anomalies in electromagnetic time series in Ileia, Greece prior to near-area earthquakes