EventsThe 2nd International Online Conference on Veterinary Sciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session S3. Antimicrobial Resistance and Food Safety: A One Health Perspective of the event The 2nd International Online Conference on Veterinary Sciences
Published date
02 Sep, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarBeiBei Li
Citation
Sepideh Asadi, Kosar Javareshkian, Evaluation of Antibacterial and Anti-biofilm Properties of Niosome-Loaded Silybum marianum Extract Against Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains, in Proceedings of The 2nd International Online Conference on Veterinary Sciences, 7 September–9 September 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Evaluation of Antibacterial and Anti-biofilm Properties of Niosome-Loaded Silybum marianum Extract Against Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains

1. Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Amol University of Special Modern Technologies, Amol, Iran.
2. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: The rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its ability to form robust biofilms has critically narrowed therapeutic options in healthcare settings. Biofilm-associated infections resist conventional antibiotics due to the protective exopolysaccharide matrix and metabolic dormancy of embedded cells. Plant-derived bioactive compounds have emerged as promising alternatives; however, poor aqueous solubility, limited stability, and low bioavailability hinder their clinical use. Niosomes—non-ionic surfactant-based vesicles—enhance pharmacokinetic profiles and enable targeted delivery of phytochemicals. Building on 2023–2025 evidence highlighting the antibiofilm potential of flavonoid-rich plant extracts, this study evaluated niosomal encapsulation of Silybum marianum extract against clinical P. aeruginosa isolates.

Method: S. marianum extract was encapsulated using the thin-film hydration technique at an optimal lipid-to-drug ratio of 20. Physicochemical parameters—particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and encapsulation efficiency (EE%)—were monitored at 4 ± 1 °C and 25 ± 1 °C to assess stability. Antibacterial efficacy was determined by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assays; anti-biofilm activity against preformed biofilms was quantified by crystal violet staining.

Results: The niosomal formulation showed a biphasic, controlled release profile. Storage at 4 ± 1 °C preserved vesicle integrity with minimal changes in particle size, PDI, and EE% compared to 25 ± 1 °C. The encapsulated extract achieved a 2- to 16-fold reduction in MIC and significantly lower MBC values relative to the free extract. The niosomal formulation also eradicated preformed biofilms more effectively than the non-encapsulated extract.

Conclusion: Niosomal encapsulation substantially enhances the antibacterial and anti-biofilm potency of S. marianum extract against clinical P. aeruginosa strains, presenting a viable nanomedicine-based strategy to revitalize the therapeutic efficacy of herbal antimicrobials against biofilm-forming pathogens.

Keywords: P. aeruginosa, S. marianum, Niosome, Biofilm

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Keywords
Keywords: P. aeruginosa
S. marianum
Niosome
Biofilm
Machine Learning for Microbiological Risk Assessment of Animal-Derived Foods: A Systematic Review Focusing on Predictive Model Validation
Molecular Epidemiology and Dissemination of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL)- producing Escherichia coli of European Wildlife: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis