EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Diagnostics
Published
This submission belongs to the session S6. Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Diagnostics
Published date
18 Sep, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarZhongheng Zhang
Citation
Kristina Shumara, Elmira Faritovna Almukhambetova, Murat Kadyrovich Almukhambetov, Generating clinical cases for diagnosing urgent conditions using artificial intelligence: opportunities for clinical practice, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Diagnostics, 23 September–24 September 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Generating clinical cases for diagnosing urgent conditions using artificial intelligence: opportunities for clinical practice

1. S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, 2nd-Year Resident in Adult and Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Almaty 050012
2. S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Department of Emergency and Urgent Medical Care, Almaty 050012
Abstract

Introduction

Timely and accurate diagnosis of critical conditions is essential in emergency medicine, as errors or delays increase the risk of complications and mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI), such as ChatGPT, can generate clinical cases for educational purposes, allowing practitioners to practice symptom recognition, rapid decision-making, prioritization of interventions, and outcome prediction—skills vital for effective emergency care.

Methods

We analyzed 50 multiple-choice clinical scenarios: 25 developed by experienced emergency physicians and 25 generated by ChatGPT using text prompts. Cases covered urgent conditions: cardiac arrest, various shocks, trauma, acute coronary syndrome, and acute respiratory failure. Five independent experts evaluated each case using ten criteria: clinical accuracy, completeness, logical consistency, realism, practical relevance, absence of errors, relevance of questions, uniqueness, and correctness of distractors. Quantitative assessment used the Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and Aiken’s V coefficient.

Results

Expert-prepared cases demonstrated high quality (3.8 ± 0.13; I-CVI = 0.984; S-CVI/Ave = 0.99; V = 0.936). AI-generated cases scored lower (3.0 ± 0.59; I-CVI = 0.496; S-CVI/Ave = 0.50; V = 0.671), mainly due to insufficient symptom detail, inconsistent logic, and variable distractor quality. AI cases can quickly cover a broad spectrum of scenarios but require refinement to ensure clinical accuracy and educational value.

Conclusion

High-quality clinical cases enhance practitioners’ ability to recognize critical symptoms, select appropriate diagnostics, and predict outcomes, reducing errors and accelerating decisions in emergencies. ChatGPT can aid in generating training cases for urgent conditions; however, expert review and revision are necessary. AI-generated content should complement, not replace, validated cases and established protocols, supporting improved diagnostic accuracy and practical value in real-world clinical practice.

Keywords
artificial intelligence
ChatGPT
emergency medicine
medical education
clinical simulation
content validity
assessment design
Poster
d6e5717447518a17c56e2c905c2b5313 (2).pdf
Plasma Exosomal circRNA Signature for Early Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study
Cross-Modal Attention Fusion for Objective Pain Assessment in Neonatal Intensive Care: A Real-Time Deep Learning Framework