EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Dentistry
Published
This submission belongs to the session S2. Dental Materials of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Dentistry
Published date
02 Oct, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarGianrico Spagnuolo
Citation
Sahba Hassan, Shailesh Jain, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MARGINAL FIT AND FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF GRAPHENE, PEEK COPING-ZIRCONIA AND ZIRCONIA CROWNS MANUFACTURED USING CAD/CAM MILLING AND 3D PRINTING TECHNIQUE – AN IN VITRO RESEARCH, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Dentistry, 7 October–9 October 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MARGINAL FIT AND FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF GRAPHENE, PEEK COPING-ZIRCONIA AND ZIRCONIA CROWNS MANUFACTURED USING CAD/CAM MILLING AND 3D PRINTING TECHNIQUE – AN IN VITRO RESEARCH

Sahba Hassan 1
Shailesh Jain 2
1. Prosthodontics And Crown & Bridge, ITS Dental College And Hospital, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India
2. Department Of Dentistry, Graphic Era Institute Of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248008, India
Abstract

Background: Recent advances in restorative dentistry have introduced novel materials such as graphene-reinforced polymers, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and zirconia, alongside evolving digital fabrication techniques. Vertical marginal fit and fracture resistance are critical to crown longevity, warranting comparison of additive (3D printing) versus subtractive (CAD/CAM milling) manufacturing.

Methods: This in vitro study evaluated 120 standardized typhodont mandibular premolars restored with full-coverage crowns of graphene-reinforced PMMA, PEEK copings veneered with zirconia, and monolithic zirconia, each fabricated by both CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing in a full factorial design (n = 20 per material per technique; 10 specimens each for marginal gap and fracture resistance evaluation). Vertical marginal gap was measured at three standardized points on SEM images of sectioned, gold sputter-coated specimens. Fracture resistance was assessed by axial compressive loading to failure in a universal testing machine. Normality was confirmed (Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Shapiro–Wilk); groups were compared using one-way ANOVA with post-hoc testing (α = 0.05).

Results: Monolithic zirconia crowns exhibited the highest fracture resistance and smallest marginal gaps, followed by PEEK-zirconia, while graphene-based crowns showed the lowest fracture resistance. Across all materials, 3D-printed crowns showed reduced marginal gaps and higher fracture resistance than CAD/CAM-milled crowns.

Conclusion: Within study limitations, 3D printing improved marginal adaptation and fracture resistance compared with CAD/CAM milling. Zirconia demonstrated the most favorable performance, followed by PEEK-zirconia, while graphene crowns showed comparatively lower mechanical performance.

Clinical Significance: 3D printing improves marginal fit and fracture resistance of metal-free crowns, particularly zirconia .

Keywords
3D Printing
Graphene
Polyetheretherketone
Zirconia
CAD/CAM
Vertical marginal gap
Fracture resistance
Poster
IOCDT2026_Poster_Graphene_PEEK_Zirconia (1).pdf
Clinical Decision Support Systems in Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry: Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy, Treatment Efficiency, and Evidence-Based Care Delivery
Prevalence of Soft Tissue Calcifications in the Head and Neck Region on Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study