EventsThe 3rd International Online Conference on Metals
Published
This submission belongs to the session S5. Additive Manufacturing of the event The 3rd International Online Conference on Metals
Published date
08 Oct, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarAbdollah Saboori
Citation
Zechen Wang, Maximilian Grimm, Thomas Lindner, Frank Schubert, Thomas Starke, Thomas Lampke, Comparison of the wear and corrosion resistance of 17-4PH manufactured by SLM and micro-SLM, in Proceedings of The 3rd International Online Conference on Metals, 12 October–14 October 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Comparison of the wear and corrosion resistance of 17-4PH manufactured by SLM and micro-SLM

image
image
image
Frank Schubert 3
Thomas Starke 4
image
1. Materials and Surface Engineering, Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Chemnitz University of Technology
2. Materials and Surface Engineering, Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany
3. Institute of Lightweight Structures and Polymer Technology, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany
4. 3D MicroPrint GmbH, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany
Abstract

The excellent corrosion resistance of 17-4PH stainless steel has led to its widespread application in aerospace and energy sectors. With the increasing demand for miniaturized and geometrically complex structures, additive manufacturing processes capable of higher resolution and precision, such as micro-selective laser melting (µSLM), are increasing attention compared to conventional selective laser melting (SLM). This study systematically compares the wear and corrosion performance of dense 17-4PH components fabricated using optimized printing parameters. XRD phase analysis revealed that the µSLM components consisted predominantly of an FCC structure, while the SLM components were mainly composed of a BCC phase. Hardness tests indicated a moderately lower value for µSLM components (296 HV0.2) than for SLM components (356 HV0.2). However, reciprocating vibration wear tests revealed that the µSLM components possess superior wear resistance. In particular, the wear volume of the µSLM components was found to be approximately four times lower than that of the SLM components, accompanied by a significantly reduced wear depth. In contrast, polarization curve tests in NaCl solution indicated a slightly inferior corrosion resistance for the µSLM components. Compared to the SLM components, µSLM components exhibited a lower corrosion potential and a higher corrosion current density, indicating a reduced resistance to electrochemical degradation. The observed microstructural differences between the two component types are primarily attributed to the laser intensity and particle size of the feedstock used during the printing process. The enhanced wear resistance of µSLM components is closely related to the FCC phase, which provides increased toughness despite the lower hardness. In contrast, the inferior corrosion performance of µSLM components is likely associated with an increased level of porosity inherent to the µSLM process.

Keywords
Micro selective laser melting (µSLM)
Selective laser melting (SLM)
17-4PH
Wear resistance
Corrosion resistance
Optimization of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Parameters for Ti-13Nb-13Zr: The Interplay Between Energy Density, Surface Integrity, and Nanomechanical Performance
Application of electron beam processing and sintering to create porous–monolithic materials based on NiTi