EventsThe 8th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences
Published
This submission belongs to the session S6. Upper Atmosphere of the event The 8th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences
Published date
09 Oct, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarGeorge Balasis
Citation
Amar Deep, Abhirup Datta, Saurabh Jha, Assessing Model Performance of SAMI3 and IRI-2020 Against GNSS-TEC Observations Under Quiet and Disturbed Space Weather Conditions at Low Latitudes, in Proceedings of The 8th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences, 14 October–16 October 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Assessing Model Performance of SAMI3 and IRI-2020 Against GNSS-TEC Observations Under Quiet and Disturbed Space Weather Conditions at Low Latitudes

Amar Deep 1
Saurabh Jha 1
1. Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Space Engineering, IIT Indore, MP, 453552, India
Abstract

The Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) introduces strong spatial and temporal variability in the ionosphere over low-latitude regions, posing significant challenges for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-based positioning, navigation, and communication systems. This study presents a comparative analysis of ionospheric Total Electron Content (TEC) derived from the physics-based Sami3 is Another Model of the Ionosphere (SAMI3) and the empirical International Reference Ionosphere 2020 (IRI-2020) models against ground-based GNSS-TEC observations from the International GNSS Service (IGS) network across contrasting space weather periods, including quiet, moderate, and geomagnetically disturbed intervals, over a low-latitude region. SAMI3 output, generated in apex coordinates, was regridded to a geographic coordinate system and vertically integrated to obtain TEC, with model time converted to local time to enable direct comparison with GNSS observations. Diurnal and day-to-day variability, EIA crest location and strength, and storm-time TEC enhancements and depletions were examined across the selected periods. During quiet-time conditions, the observed daytime peak TEC reached 63 TECU, whereas SAMI3 and IRI-2020 underestimated the daytime maximum, with peak values of 41 and 40 TECU, respectively; IRI-2020 also exhibited a phase lag in peak timing. Near the pre-dawn minimum, IRI-2020 reproduced the observations (4–5 TECU) more closely than SAMI3 (2–3 TECU). In the post-sunset sector, SAMI3 decayed markedly faster than the observations, underestimating TEC by more than 50% during quiet-time evening hours, whereas IRI-2020 exhibited a more gradual, observation-consistent decline into the night. These results indicate that SAMI3 better reproduces the timing of daytime EIA development, whereas IRI-2020 better captures evening and nighttime TEC persistence, reflecting differences between the physics-based photochemical processes represented in SAMI3 and the smoother climatological formulation of IRI-2020. The comparison provides insight into model-specific biases relevant to regional GNSS error mitigation and future SAMI3–GNSS-TEC data assimilation efforts.

Keywords
sami3
IRI
Equatorial Ionization Anomaly
Citizen-Driven Air Pollution Dynamics and Adaptation in Delhi: A Remote Sensing and Air Quality Data Analysis (2018–2025)
Global Thermosphere–Ionosphere Coupling During the May 2024 Geomagnetic Superstorm: Insights from GIM Observations, SAMI3, and GITM