EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Processes
Published
This submission belongs to the session S2. Chemical Processes and Systems of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Processes
Published date
15 Oct, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarBlaž Likozar
Citation
Alexey Kisel', Egor V Lupachev, 2-bromo-2,2-difluoroacetic acid: effect of catalyst loading order on methyl 2‑bromo‑2,2‑difluoroacetate and 2,2,2‑trifluoroacetic acid transesterification reaction kinetics, in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Processes, 20 October–22 October 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

2-bromo-2,2-difluoroacetic acid: effect of catalyst loading order on methyl 2‑bromo‑2,2‑difluoroacetate and 2,2,2‑trifluoroacetic acid transesterification reaction kinetics

1. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991 Russia
Abstract

The present work addresses the heterogeneous catalytic transesterification of methyl 2‑bromo‑2,2‑difluoroacetate (MeBrDFAc) with 2,2,2‑trifluoroacetic acid (TFAc) to produce 2‑bromo‑2,2‑difluoroacetic acid (BrDFAc). This compound is a valuable synthetic intermediate for the selective difluoromethylation of bioactive molecules, including anticancer pharmaceuticals, and is also utilized in the production of specialty polymers.

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the catalyst loading sequence on the reaction kinetics, as the order of reagent introduction may significantly affect mass transfer and the accessibility of active sites in heterogeneous systems. The transesterification was conducted in a thermostatically controlled stirred batch reactor at atmospheric pressure and a constant temperature of 70°C. AmberLyst 35WET, a commercial macroreticular sulfonic acid resin, was employed as the solid acid catalyst. The progress of the reaction was monitored by 1H and 19F NMR spectroscopy.

Two reagent addition protocols were compared. In the first, the catalyst was premixed with MeBrDFAc, the suspension was heated to the set temperature, and TFAc was then introduced. In the second, the catalyst was added to the reactor immediately before the TFAc feed, with no prior contact with the ester.

Kinetic analysis revealed that the first protocol afforded a consistently higher reaction rate constant throughout the experiment. This effect is attributed to the difference in pore-filling dynamics. In the first case, MeBrDFAc has sufficient time to saturate the internal pore volume of the catalyst prior to acid introduction, ensuring a high local ester concentration at the active sites. In the second case, both substrates are introduced nearly simultaneously, resulting in competitive pore occupation. Since the acid‑catalysed transesterification mechanism is initiated by the cleavage of the ester, the enhanced intraparticle concentration of MeBrDFAc under the first protocol provides a kinetic advantage, thereby accelerating the overall process.

Keywords
Keywords: 2‑bromo‑2,2‑difluoroacetate
2,2,2‑trifluoroacetic acid
2‑bromo‑2,2‑difluoroacetic acid
heterogeneous catalysis
transesterification
reaction kinetics
Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) by Bacillus sp. CYR1 and Cupriavidus sp. CI1 Using Untreated Molasses
Recycle Of Spent Halloysite-based Catalysts For Lithium Removal from aqueous solutions