EventsThe 5th International Electronic Conference on Processes
Published
This submission belongs to the session S4. Process Control, Monitoring and Machine Learning of the event The 5th International Electronic Conference on Processes
Published date
15 Oct, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarRavendra Singh
Citation
Abhishek Singh, AI-Enabled Real-Time Process Monitoring: A Framework for Intelligent Automation in Industrial Systems, in Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Processes, 20 October–22 October 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

AI-Enabled Real-Time Process Monitoring: A Framework for Intelligent Automation in Industrial Systems

Abhishek Singh 1
1. Technology Management (Computing), Asia Pacific University (affiliated with Staffordshire University, UK), kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
Abstract

Abstract

Industrial manufacturing processes generate vast amounts of data, yet most traditional monitoring systems struggle to keep up — missing anomalies, reacting slowly, and requiring constant human supervision. Real-time monitoring remains challenging due to process complexity and the difficulty of measuring critical quality variables as they occur [1,2]. As automation scales and sensor data volumes grow, rule-based and manual approaches become increasingly inadequate for fault detection and process control [3]. A systematic framework is therefore needed to enable automated monitoring with fewer resources.

This paper proposes a machine learning-based framework for real-time industrial process monitoring. Sensor data is collected and routed through an AI inference pipeline that flags deviations before failures occur. The framework comprises a data pre-processing module, an anomaly detection engine, and an automated alert system — designed to generalize across chemical plants, manufacturing floors, and energy systems without domain-specific rebuilding [4].

AI-driven monitoring reduces human intervention, cuts unplanned downtime, and improves process predictability [5]. This paper also addresses organizational deployment and scaling — the layer where most implementations fail. The work sits at the intersection of AI, process engineering, and industrial automation.

References

[1] L. Cao et al., IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2025. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2025.3556830

[2] D. Tiwari et al., Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B, vol. 235, no. 13, pp. 2035–2051, 2021. doi: 10.1177/09544054211016675

[3] H. Nizam et al., IEEE Sens. J., vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 22836–22849, 2022. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3211874

[4] M. Pech et al., Sensors, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 1470, 2021. doi: 10.3390/s21041470

[5] A. Jaramillo-Alcazar et al., Sensors, vol. 23, no. 19, p. 8286, 2023. doi: 10.3390/s23198286

Keywords
Real-time monitoring
Anomaly detection
Machine learning
Industrial automation
Process control
Fault detection
Intelligent automation
Intelligent Steam Consumption Control in Tire Vulcanization Processes Using ANFIS-GA Digital Twin Modeling and MPC
Intelligent Modelling of Valve Opening in Supercritical CO₂ Extraction Processes Using ANFIS, PSO, and GA