EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Geriatrics
Published
This submission belongs to the session S1. Neurology/ Psychiatry in the elderly of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Geriatrics
Published date
19 Oct, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarDaniel Chan
Citation
Lore Mertens, Marte Vandeweyer, Laura Tack, Freya Meganck, Laurence Depoorter, Lore Ketelaars, Lisa Gysel, Laura Keunebrock, Ann-Sophie Maenhoudt, Marie Delabie, Fenne De Clercq, Pieter-Jan Geerts, Hans Wildiers, Cindy Kenis, Tom Boterberg, Hannelore Denys, Nora Sundahl, Aurélie De Bruycker, Liesbeth Schauvliege, Mohammad Najlah, Steve Conlan, Patricia Schofield, Benoit Beuselinck, Marianne Hanssens, Philip Robert Debruyne, Diagnostic Performance of the PHQ-2 and Other Brief Screening Tools for Depression in Vulnerable Older Patients with Cancer: A Prospective Validation Study, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Geriatrics, 22 October–23 October 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Diagnostic Performance of the PHQ-2 and Other Brief Screening Tools for Depression in Vulnerable Older Patients with Cancer: A Prospective Validation Study

image
Freya Meganck 1
Laurence Depoorter 3
Lore Ketelaars 4
Lisa Gysel 4
Laura Keunebrock 4
Ann-Sophie Maenhoudt 4
Marie Delabie 4
Fenne De Clercq 4
Nora Sundahl 2,10
Aurélie De Bruycker 10
Liesbeth Schauvliege 11
image
image
image
image
1. OECI-Designated Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
2. Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
3. Department of Geriatrics, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
4. Clinical Psychology/Geriatric Oncology, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
5. Department of Psychiatry, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
6. Department of Medical Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
7. Department of Geriatric Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospitals, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
9. Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
10. Department of Radiation Oncology, OECI-Designated Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
11. Department of Haematology, OECI-Designated Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
12. Biomedical and Health Innovation Research Centre (BHIRC), School of Allied Health and Social Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK
13. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom
14. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
15. Faculty of Medicine, Leuven University, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
16. Department of Medical Oncology, OECI-Designated Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
Abstract

Introduction: Depression is common but frequently underrecognized in older adults with cancer, as depressive symptoms often overlap with cancer- and treatment-related complaints. The current NCCN Older Adult Oncology guidelines recommend the two- and nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2, PHQ-9) and the shortened four-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4) for emotional screening. However, these PHQ versions have not been validated in vulnerable older adults with cancer, and evidence for the GDS-4 remains limited. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of several depression screening tools in vulnerable older patients with cancer, with validation of the PHQ-2 (cut-off ≥ 2) as the primary endpoint.

Methods: In this single-centre prospective cohort study, patients aged ≥70 years who were recently diagnosed with cancer and/or started a new line of active cancer treatment, and were classified as ‘vulnerable’ by the Geriatric 8 screening tool (score ≤ 14), were recruited at the Kortrijk Cancer Centre (Belgium). Participants completed the GDS-15 (including GDS-4) and the PHQ-9 (including PHQ-2). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed against the depression module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and diagnostic performance indices (sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-) were calculated.

Results: A total of 155 vulnerable patients were included (December 2023 – May 2026). According to the SCID-5-CV, 34 patients (21.9%) met criteria for minor depression (n=18) or major depressive disorder (n=16). The PHQ-2 showed excellent discriminative ability, with an AUROC of 0.944 (95% CI 0.897–0.991), outperforming the PHQ-9 (0.909), PHQ-9 after a positive PHQ-2 (0.889), GDS-15 (0.660) and GDS-4 (0.618). At the predefined cut-off of ≥2, the PHQ-2 demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 90.9%.

Discussion: These findings support the PHQ-2 as a practical first-line screening instrument to identify vulnerable older adults with cancer in need of further diagnostic evaluation for depression.

Keywords
Geriatric oncology
Depression screening
Diagnostic performance
Patient Health Questionnaire 2
Improving the Safety of Rapid Tranquilisation in Delirious Elderly In-patients through Pharmacological Education
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the WHOQOL-AGE in a Greek older adult population