EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Geriatrics
Published
This submission belongs to the session S3. Internal Medicine of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Geriatrics
Published date
19 Oct, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarRoger E. Thomas
Citation
Philip Robert Debruyne, Lore Mertens, Marte Vandeweyer, Laura Tack, Laurence Depoorter, Lore Ketelaars, Lisa Gysel, Laura Keunebrock, Ann-Sophie Maenhoudt, Marie Delabie, Fenne De Clercq, Tom Boterberg, Hannelore Denys, Alexander Vanden Bulcke, Karin Stellamans, Nick Liefhooghe, Koen Maes, Laure Nuytemans, Mohammad Najlah, Patricia Schofield, Implementation of a Psychologist-Led Geriatric Oncology Care Model: A Retrospective Evaluation of Quality Indicator Data, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Geriatrics, 22 October–23 October 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Implementation of a Psychologist-Led Geriatric Oncology Care Model: A Retrospective Evaluation of Quality Indicator Data

image
image
Laurence Depoorter 6
Lore Ketelaars 7
Lisa Gysel 7
Laura Keunebrock 7
Ann-Sophie Maenhoudt 7
Marie Delabie 7
Fenne De Clercq 7
Alexander Vanden Bulcke 10
Karin Stellamans 11
Nick Liefhooghe 11
Koen Maes 12
Laure Nuytemans 1
image
image
1. Department of Medical Oncology, OECI-Designated Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
3. Biomedical and Health Innovation Research Centre (BHIRC), School of Allied Health and Social Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK
4. OECI-Designated Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
5. Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
6. Department of Geriatrics, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
7. Clinical Psychology/Geriatric Oncology, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospitals, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
9. Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
10. Department of Digestive Oncology, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
11. Department of Radiation Oncology, OECI-Designated Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
12. Department of Haematology, OECI-Designated Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
Abstract

Introduction: Older adults with cancer are a heterogeneous population in whom treatment decisions should be informed by functional rather than chronological age. Since 2010, the Kortrijk Cancer Centre (Belgium) has implemented a hospital-wide, psychologist-led geriatric oncology care model, in which clinical psychologists perform a two-step geriatric assessment (GA). All patients aged ≥ 70 years with a new cancer diagnosis and/or starting a new line of active treatment are routinely screened with the Geriatric 8 (G8) questionnaire, covering age, nutrition, weight loss, mobility, neuropsychological condition, BMI, medication and health status. Patients with G8 ≤ 14 proceed to a short comprehensive geriatric assessment (sCGA).

Methods: This retrospective evaluation analysed routinely collected quality indicator data on geriatric assessment implementation. Patients aged ≥ 70 years with at least two contacts at the oncology day hospital and a multidisciplinary tumour board meeting between January 2024 and May 2026 were included. Data were extracted from the electronic health record and visualised in a real-time Power BI dashboard. The primary outcome was the proportion of eligible patients receiving G8 screening, benchmarked against a predefined institutional target of 80%.

Results: A total of 891 patients were eligible for G8 screening, of whom 850 (95.4%) were screened. After accounting for documented valid exceptions (e.g. hormonal therapy only, myelodysplastic syndrome or absence of malignancy; n=34), overall screening coverage reached 99.2%. Quarterly screening rates consistently exceeded the 80% benchmark throughout the observation period. Secondary analyses revealed that, among screened patients, 468 (55.1%) were classified as vulnerable (G8 ≤ 14).

Discussion: These findings demonstrate that a psychologist-led, two-step geriatric oncology model can achieve exceptionally high and sustained implementation of GA in routine oncology care. The Kortrijk model illustrates a well-developed example of structurally embedded geriatric assessment in older adults with cancer.

Keywords
Geriatric oncology
Geriatric assessment
Implementation evaluation
Quality indicator
Preventive care and healthy aging: A Study in the Albanian population
No Incremental Value of mGPS Beyond CGA for Six-Month Survival in Older Advanced Cancer Patients