EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Geriatrics
Published
This submission belongs to the session S3. Internal Medicine of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Geriatrics
Published date
19 Oct, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarJonathan Hewitt
Citation
Marte Vandeweyer, Lore Mertens, Laura Tack, Freya Meganck, Hans Wildiers, Cindy Kenis, Benoit Beuselinck, Tom Boterberg, Hannelore Denys, Patricia Schofield, Mohammad Najlah, Laurence Depoorter, Lore Ketelaars, Lisa Gysel, Laura Keunebrock, Ann-Sophie Maenhoudt, Marie Delabie, Fenne De Clercq, Daan Nevens, Laurence Goethals, Isabelle Kindts, Koen Van Eygen, Philip Debruyne, No Incremental Value of mGPS Beyond CGA for Six-Month Survival in Older Advanced Cancer Patients, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Geriatrics, 22 October–23 October 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

No Incremental Value of mGPS Beyond CGA for Six-Month Survival in Older Advanced Cancer Patients

image
Freya Meganck 3
image
image
Laurence Depoorter 11
Lore Ketelaars 11
Lisa Gysel 11
Laura Keunebrock 11
Ann-Sophie Maenhoudt 11
Marie Delabie 11
Fenne De Clercq 11
Daan Nevens 12
Laurence Goethals 12
Koen Van Eygen 13
image
1. Department of Medical Oncology, OECI-Designated Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
2. Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
3. OECI-Designated Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
4. Department of Medical Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
5. Department of Geriatric Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
6. Department of Medical Oncology; Faculty of Medicine; Experimental Oncology, Leuven University; Leuven University Hospitals, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
7. Department of Human Structure and Repair; Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University; Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
8. Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University; Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
9. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL4 7BZ, UK
10. Biomedical and Health Innovation Research Centre (BHIRC), School of Allied Health and Social Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK
11. Department of Geriatric Oncology, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
12. Department of Radiotherapy; OECI-Designated Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
13. Department of Haematology, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
Abstract

Introduction: Accurate prognostication is essential to guide treatment decisions and care planning in older patients with cancer. The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), an inflammation-based biomarker combining C-reactive protein and albumin, is recommended by the European Society for Medical Oncology for prognostic assessment. However, its added value beyond comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in vulnerable older patients remains unclear. This study evaluated whether mGPS improves six-month survival prediction.

Methods: In this retrospective study, patients aged ≥70 years with stage IV cancer were identified from registries at the Kortrijk Cancer Centre (Belgium) from November 2012 onwards. All patients underwent Geriatric 8 (G8) screening; vulnerable patients (G8 ≤14/17) received a CGA. Prognostic models were constructed using variables identified in univariable survival analyses and retained as independent predictors in multivariable Cox models on a complete-case cohort. The incremental prognostic value of mGPS was evaluated by comparing AUROC between models with and without mGPS using DeLong’s test.

Results: In vulnerable stage IV patients (n = 308), the baseline CGA model, based on complete-case multivariable analysis (n = 129), demonstrated moderate discrimination for six-month survival (AUROC = 0.661). Addition of mGPS did not significantly improve prognostic performance (AUROC = 0.661 vs 0.662; Δ = +0.001; DeLong p = 0.8851). Similar findings were observed at 3-, 9-, and 12-month time points (AUROC base vs +mGPS: 0.672 vs 0.703, 0.717 vs 0.712, and 0.726 vs 0.724, respectively; all DeLong p > 0.05). These findings were consistent across secondary and exploratory analyses, including models incorporating ECOG and G8, and in non-vulnerable and haematological cohorts.

Discussion: mGPS did not demonstrate meaningful incremental predictive value beyond the CGA, as reflected by minimal and non-significant improvements in AUROC. This may suggest that the prognostic information captured by mGPS largely overlaps with CGA-derived prognostic variables and is already encompassed within prior G8-based stratification.

Keywords
Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS)
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)
Geriatric oncology
Advanced cancer
Prognosis
Survival prediction
Stage IV cancer
ECOG performance status
G8 screening
Biomarkers
Implementation of a Psychologist-Led Geriatric Oncology Care Model: A Retrospective Evaluation of Quality Indicator Data
APPLICATION OF FRAX® 2.0 IN ASSESSING FRACTURE RISK IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING OLDER ADULTS