Contemporary families face multiple considerations when practicing sustainable food consumption, including health needs, food safety, affordability, environmental responsibility, and intergenerational dietary care. Family food purchasing is therefore not merely an individual consumer choice, but a decision making practice involving everyday coordination and household governance. This study aims to develop an evaluation framework for sustainable family food purchasing applicable to households with members across age groups. The fuzzy Delphi method was employed to build expert consensus and confirm the conceptual appropriateness, practical relevance, and clarity of the proposed dimensions and indicators. Based on a literature review, an initial framework was developed, and experts participated in three rounds of evaluation. Fuzzy linguistic assessment, triangular fuzzy numbers, and defuzzification procedures were used to examine the indicators, while mean scores and standard deviations served as retention criteria for the dimensions and indicators. The results show a high level of consistency among experts. All six dimensions met the retention criteria of a mean score of 4.00 or above and a standard deviation of 1.00 or below. Mean scores ranged from 4.39 to 4.85. Food Safety and Certification Trust received the highest evaluation (MS = 4.85, SD = 0.36), followed by Health and Nutritional Value (MS = 4.78, SD = 0.41). Economic and Price Considerations received the lowest score (MS = 4.39, SD = 0.71), but still met the retention criteria, indicating that affordability remains a necessary condition for sustainable household food purchasing. This study repositions sustainable food purchasing as a micro level governance practice within family contexts and provides a framework for family food education, sustainable consumption promotion, and food policy design.