EventsThe 7th International Electronic Conference on Foods
Published
This submission belongs to the session A. AI, Technology & Engineering in Food of the event The 7th International Electronic Conference on Foods
Published date
23 Oct, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarNazimah Hamid
Citation
Piotr Lukasiak, Katarzyna Marciniak-Lukasiak, Anna Zbikowska, Multicriteria Quality Indices as a Tool for Estimating Consumer Desirability of Gluten-Free Bread Enriched with Chestnut Flour, in Proceedings of The 7th International Electronic Conference on Foods, 28 October–30 October 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Multicriteria Quality Indices as a Tool for Estimating Consumer Desirability of Gluten-Free Bread Enriched with Chestnut Flour

image
1. Poznan University of Technology, Institute of Computing Sciences, Poznan, Poland
2. Institute of Food Sciences, Department of Food Technology and Assessment, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop multicriteria quality indices for gluten-free bread enriched with chestnut flour and to determine whether an index based only on physicochemical and textural attributes could approximate the consumer desirability ranking of bread formulations. This approach was intended as a practical tool supporting quality assessment, rather than as a replacement for sensory evaluation.

The analysis was conducted using data from formulations containing 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20% chestnut flour. Partial indices were calculated for texture, physicochemical properties, colour, and sensory quality. These were then combined into an integrated quality index and a physicochemical-textural index excluding all sensory variables. The direction of desirability for each attribute was defined according to its technological relevance. Lower hardness, gumminess, chewiness, and specific mass were treated as favourable, whereas higher loaf volume, porosity, springiness, and cohesiveness were considered beneficial. Variables with less straightforward technological interpretation were used cautiously or retained only for supplementary analyses.

The integrated quality index ranked the 5% formulation highest, followed by 10%, 15%, 0%, and 20%, with index values of 0.729, 0.672, 0.527, 0.429, and 0.181, respectively. The physicochemical-textural index produced the same ranking for the three highest-rated formulations, with values of 0.646, 0.584, and 0.482 for the 5%, 10%, and 15% formulations, respectively. Its agreement with consumer desirability was high at the ranking level, with Spearman’s rho = 0.90 and Pearson’s r = 0.80.

Feature reduction analysis showed that four measurements, TPA hardness, volume per 100 g, porosity, and crumb lightness L*, were sufficient to approximate the full quality ranking, with MAE = 0.035, RMSE = 0.046, R² = 0.943, and Spearman’s rho = 1.00. Further validation is required using independent baking trials, different chestnut flour sources, and varied baking conditions.

Keywords
gluten-free bread
chestnut flour
multicriteria quality index
consumer desirability ranking
data analysis
Sustainable Packaging for Extra Virgin Olive Oil: A Comparative Shelf-Life Study
Evaluating the storage stability of snail meat powders from Cornu aspersum