EventsThe 2nd International Online Conference on Risk and Financial Management
Published
This submission belongs to the session S2. Machine Learning for Next-Generation Risk Modeling of the event The 2nd International Online Conference on Risk and Financial Management
Published date
28 Oct, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarThanasis Stengos
Citation
Pooja Venugopal Baskaran, Madhavan Panneerselvam Kumar, ML-Powered Corporate Bond Liquidity Scoring: A Multi-Measure XGBoost Framework on FINRA TRACE Data with SHAP Interpretability, in Proceedings of The 2nd International Online Conference on Risk and Financial Management, 2 November–4 November 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

ML-Powered Corporate Bond Liquidity Scoring: A Multi-Measure XGBoost Framework on FINRA TRACE Data with SHAP Interpretability

1. Independent Researcher, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
2. Artificial Intelligence, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
Abstract

Introduction: Corporate bond illiquidity remains a persistent challenge in fixed income markets, with significant implications for pricing accuracy, transaction cost analysis, and portfolio risk management. Traditional single-measure proxies — such as the Amihud illiquidity ratio or Roll spread — capture only partial dimensions of bond market liquidity, leaving systematic mispricing risk unaddressed. This paper introduces a machine learning framework that integrates multiple classical and market-microstructure liquidity measures into a unified, interpretable scoring system for US corporate bonds.

Methods: Using FINRA TRACE transaction data, we engineer 40+ features spanning four liquidity dimensions: price impact (Amihud illiquidity ratio, Kyle's lambda), trading costs (Roll spread, effective bid-ask spread), market depth (inter-trade duration, trade size distribution), and flow toxicity (volume-weighted price impact). An XGBoost classifier is trained on investment-grade and high-yield bond universes, with Optuna-driven hyperparameter optimisation and time-series-aware cross-validation to prevent look-ahead bias. Model interpretability is addressed through SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis, identifying the marginal contribution of each feature to individual liquidity scores.

Results: The multi-measure XGBoost model achieves superior classification accuracy compared to single-measure baselines (Amihud, Roll), with SHAP analysis revealing that inter-trade duration and Kyle's lambda are the dominant predictors of bond illiquidity episodes. The model identifies liquidity deterioration signals 1–3 days ahead of spread widening in high-yield segments.

Conclusions: This framework provides a scalable, ML-powered approach to corporate bond liquidity scoring with direct applications in RFQ pricing desks, portfolio construction, and regulatory liquidity stress testing. Code and data pipeline are available on GitHub.

Keywords
corporate bond liquidity
XGBoost
FINRA TRACE
SHAP interpretability
market microstructure
fixed income ML
Institutional Sentiment as an Early Warning System for Supply Chain Risk: A Machine Learning Approach
Revisiting AI and Machine Learning Techniques in Finance and Economics: A Regression-Based Perspective