EventsThe 30th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry
Published
with-doi10.3390/chemproc2026022011 (registering DOI)
This submission belongs to the session Session 2. Chemistry of Bioorganics, Medicinal and Natural Products of the event The 30th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry
Published date
02 Nov, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarJulio A. Seijas
Citation
FAIZA ASLI, Identification of Quinazoline-Based EGFR Inhibitors Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using an Integrated In Silico Approach, in Proceedings of The 30th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 5 November–19 November 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, doi: 10.3390/chemproc2026022011
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Identification of Quinazoline-Based EGFR Inhibitors Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using an Integrated In Silico Approach

1. Department of Chemistry, University Mohamed Khider Biskra, BISKRA, 07000, Algeria
Abstract

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer characterized by the absence of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), limiting the effectiveness of targeted therapies. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently overexpressed in TNBC, making it an attractive therapeutic target. Quinazoline derivatives have shown potential as EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Methods: Twenty-six quinazoline derivatives were evaluated against EGFR (PDB ID: 3UG2) using an integrated in silico workflow. Hierarchical molecular docking (HTVS, SP, and XP) was performed using the Glide module in Schrödinger Maestro. The top-ranked compounds were further analyzed through ligand–protein interaction studies and Prime MM-GBSA binding free energy calculations. Pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles were predicted using SwissADME and ProTox-II, respectively.

Results: Gefitinib exhibited the highest binding affinity with an XP GlideScore of −7.780 kcal/mol. Among the investigated derivatives, S26 showed the best docking score (−7.304 kcal/mol), followed by S16 (−6.842 kcal/mol) and S24 (−6.757 kcal/mol). All selected compounds maintained the conserved hydrogen bond with Met793 within the ATP-binding pocket. S24 exhibited the most favorable MM-GBSA binding free energy (ΔG_bind = −76.85 kcal/mol), whereas SwissADME predicted favorable drug-likeness and pharmacokinetic properties. Toxicity prediction identified S16 as the compound with the most favorable safety profile.

Conclusion: The integrated computational approach identified S26, S24, and S16 as promising quinazoline-based EGFR inhibitors. S24 emerged as the most balanced lead compound, while S26 exhibited the strongest docking affinity and S16 demonstrated the best predicted safety profile. These findings support experimental validation.

 

Keywords
Triple-negative breast cancer; EGFR; Quinazoline derivatives; Molecular docking; MM-GBSA; SwissADME; ProTox-II.
Manuscript
Sciforum-207812 chemproc-22-00011.pdf
Associative interactions of tert-butyl hydroperoxide with halide anions: intermolecular dynamics and NMR spectra parameters
A Self-Healing Elastomer Synthesis for Flexible Wet Electrical Connectors Based on Reversible Supramolecular Interactions