EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Technologies
Published
This submission belongs to the session S1. Information and Communication Technologies of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Technologies
Published date
06 Nov, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarAchilles D. Boursianis
Citation
Nikita Pechin, Vladimir Toporovsky, Oleg Kolesnikov, Ilya Galaktionov, Economic feasibility and deployment scenarios for 10G/25G PON technologies in large-scale access network rollout, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Technologies, 11 November–13 November 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Economic feasibility and deployment scenarios for 10G/25G PON technologies in large-scale access network rollout

Nikita Pechin 1
Vladimir Toporovsky 2,3
image
1. Department of quantum and optical links, Moscow Technical University of Communications and Informatics, Moscow 111024, Russia
2. Quantum Center, Moscow Technical University of Communications and Informatics, Moscow, 111024, Russia
3. Department of Higher Mathematics, MIREA – Russian Technological University, 78 Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow 119454, Russia
4. Physics Department, Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, 107023, Russia
Abstract

The migration from copper access to FTTH is a major technical and economic challenge for telecom operators. This study analyzes PON technologies—GPON (2.5/1.25 Gbit/s), XGS-PON (10/10 Gbit/s), and emerging 25G-PON—using average Russian equipment prices as of Q1 2026. It evaluates manufacturing readiness, CAPEX, OPEX, and deployment recommendations.

For a typical 100-apartment building with 1:32 splitting, GPON investment is $5,100: OLT ports $200, 100 ONTs $2,100, passive infrastructure $2,800. XGS-PON costs $8,400: OLT ports $800, ONTs $4,800, plus identical passive infrastructure, giving 1.65× higher upfront CAPEX. OPEX is modeled as a fixed annual share of CAPEX. With monthly revenue of $7 for GPON and $11 for XGS-PON, XGS-PON delivers $1,400 more first-year net profit despite higher CAPEX. Payback is 8 months for GPON and 9 months for XGS-PON; rankings remain stable under reasonable revenue variations.

25G-PON is qualitatively assessed as an intermediate upgrade between XGS-PON and 50G-PON. It reuses passive infrastructure and requires only OLT line-card and ONT replacement, so economics are close to XGS-PON with modest CAPEX increase and a clear migration path.

Five deployment scenarios are derived: urban high-density, suburban low-density, GPON upgrade, business campuses, and long-term planning (5–7 years). The key recommendation: operators should choose XGS-PON for new rollouts, while GPON remains viable in low-density areas. The results offer a quantitative framework for telecom infrastructure rollout decisions.

Keywords
passive optical networks (PON)
GPON
XGS-PON
25G-PON
CAPEX
OPEX
economic feasibility
payback period
deployment scenarios
access network rollout
manufacturing technologies
AI-Assisted Digital Signal Recovery for Nonlinear Optical Wireless Links: A Software-Defined Approach
Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation: Challenges and Opportunities for Youth Employment in Europe