EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Technologies
Published
This submission belongs to the session S1. Information and Communication Technologies of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Technologies
Published date
06 Nov, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarXiaoqiang Zhang
Contribution&Funding
Funding: This study received no funding
Citation
Jaafar JAAFARI, FatimaEzzahra LAGHRISSI, El Mehdi Saoudi, Detecting Unseen Adversarial Image Manipulations Using Lightweight Statistical and Frequency Features, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Technologies, 11 November–13 November 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Detecting Unseen Adversarial Image Manipulations Using Lightweight Statistical and Frequency Features

Jaafar JAAFARI 1
FatimaEzzahra LAGHRISSI 2
El Mehdi Saoudi 1
1. Laboratory of Data Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Faculty of Sciences Ain Chock, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco
2. Machine Intelligence Laboratory, , Faculty of Sciences and Technologies Mohammedia, Hassan II University, Mohammedia, Morocco
Abstract

Adversarial perturbations can change a vision model's decision while remaining visually subtle, creating an integrity risk for AI-enabled imaging systems. This study asks whether a compact detector trained on one attack can identify a different, unseen attack without requiring the original clean image. A multilayer perceptron was trained on the 1,797-image scikit-learn Digits dataset using five stratified 70/15/15 train-validation-test splits. Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) perturbations used an L-infinity budget of 0.15. Twelve image-domain descriptors captured pixel statistics, local gradients, total variation, Laplacian response, entropy, and FFT/DCT energy. A class-weighted histogram gradient-boosting detector was trained only on clean and FGSM images. Its threshold was selected on validation data and transferred unchanged to the unseen PGD test. Clean classification accuracy was 96.74% ± 0.80%. FGSM and PGD succeeded against 78.23% ± 3.49% and 87.03% ± 4.25% of initially correct test images, respectively. On known FGSM examples, the detector achieved 99.85% ± 0.08% ROC AUC and 98.00% ± 0.50% recall. On unseen PGD examples, ROC AUC remained 99.85% ± 0.04%, recall reached 98.67% ± 0.56%, and balanced accuracy was 98.15% ± 0.54%, with a 2.37% ± 1.50% clean-image false-positive rate. Pixel standard deviation, mean intensity, and maximum local gradient were the dominant permutation-importance features. Lightweight image statistics transferred effectively from a single-step to an unseen iterative attack in this controlled benchmark. The result supports inexpensive pre-screening for image-integrity threats, but the small grayscale dataset and nonadaptive attacks preclude deployment claims. Validation on contemporary, higher-resolution and medical images is required.

Keywords
adversarial machine learning
image integrity
computer vision
cybersecurity
frequency-domain analysis
attack generalization
AI-Assisted Didactic Engineering in Practice: A Case Study of Digital Transposition in Mathematics Education
An AI-Driven Framework for Organizational E-Reputation Management: Combining Predictive Monitoring, Weak Signal Detection, and Explainable Governance