EventsThe 1st International Online Conference on Technologies
Published
This submission belongs to the session S4. Manufacturing Technologies of the event The 1st International Online Conference on Technologies
Published date
06 Nov, 2026
Academic Editor
author-avatarEugene Wong
Citation
Bogdan Vasile Nastase, Dragos Gabriel Zisopol, Mihail Minescu, Experimental and numerical investigation of the impact behavior of additively manufactured auxetic structures, in Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Technologies, 11 November–13 November 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Experimental and numerical investigation of the impact behavior of additively manufactured auxetic structures

image
1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Petroleum - Gas university of Ploiesti, Ploiesti, 100680, Romania
Abstract

One of the challenges encountered in the selection of auxetic structures is represented by the specific loading conditions. This study investigates the mechanical performance of five auxetic structure types: reentrant, arrowhead, tetra-chiral, hybrid honeycomb (HB structure) and an x shaped cell (x-cell) structure, additively manufactured from polylactic acid (PLA+) and printed on Creality K2 Plus 3D printer by fused filament fabrication (FFF) technology. The mechanical performance was evaluated by Charpy impact tests on 25 specimens, five for each structure. The specimens were designed according to ASTM D6110-04 and had nominal dimensions of 125 × 12.7 × 12.7 mm. The technological parameters used for printing are deposited layer height 0.20 mm, infill percentage 100%, printing temperature 220°C and bed temperature 50°C. To ensure comparability between the different types of structures, the technological parameters were the same for each specimen. The experimental results show the influence that the internal structure has on the impact resistance. In the case of the hybrid structure, this was approximately 30% higher than the tetra-chiral structure which is the next ranked, while the x-cell, arrowhead and reentrant structures recorded very close results, with differences of up to 3%. Thus, the difference in behavior highlights the need to adapt geometry to the type of stress. The finite element analysis (FEA) showed similar results to the experimental ones and confirms the internal geometry as an important factor for impact resistance and for choosing the type of auxetic structure.

Keywords
Charpy tests
auxetic structures
finite element analysis (FEA)
fused filament fabrication (FFF)
Impact of AI Assisted Quality Inspection on Manufacturing: A Socio-Economic Analysis
Orientational precision of a delta manipulator under drone