EventsDrones 2026: Mapping the Knowledge
Published
This submission belongs to the session S5. Drones in Rangelands, Agriculture, and Forestry of the event Drones 2026: Mapping the Knowledge
Published date
12 Nov, 2026
Contribution&Funding
Conceptualization,
[Mollie L Kemp] ; [Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso] ; [Sorin C Popescu] ; [J. Silverio Avila-S.]
Methodology,
[Mollie L Kemp] ; [J. Silverio Avila-S.] ; [Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso]
Software,
[Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso]
Validation,
[Mollie L Kemp] ; [Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso]
Formal analysis,
[Mollie L Kemp] ; [J. Silverio Avila-S.] ; [Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso]
Investigation,
[Shanna R Gleason] ; [Nuria Gomez-Casanovas] ; [William E Pinchak] ; [Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso] ; [Mollie L Kemp]
Resources,
[J. Silverio Avila-S.] ; [Sorin C Popescu] ; [Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso] ; [William E Pinchak] ; [Mollie L Kemp]
Data curation,
[Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso] ; [Conner A Ties] ; [Shanna R Gleason] ; [Mollie L Kemp]
Writing - original draft,
[Mollie L Kemp] ; [Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso]
Writing - review,
[editing] ; [Shanna R Gleason] ; [Conner A Ties] ; [Nuria Gomez-Casanovas] ; [Andres Cibils] ; [William E Pinchak] ; [Sorin C Popescu] ; [Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso] ; [J. Silverio Avila-S.] ; [Mollie L Kemp]
Supervision,
[Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso] ; [J. Silverio Avila-S.]
Project administration,
[Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso] ; [J. Silverio Avila-S.]
Funding acquisition,
[J. Silverio Avila-S.] ; [Andres Cibils]
Funding: ARS-USDA Agreement # 58-3070-4-046
Citation
Mollie L Kemp, J. Silverio Avila-S., Sorin C Popescu, Andres Cibils, Conner A Ties, Shanna R Gleason, Nuria Gomez-Casanovas, William E Pinchak, Humberto L Perotto-Baldivieso, Landscape-Level Forage Estimation Using Fine-Scale Drone Imagery in Rangelands, in Proceedings of Drones 2026: Mapping the Knowledge, Barcelona, 11 November–13 November 2026, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Landscape-Level Forage Estimation Using Fine-Scale Drone Imagery in Rangelands

J. Silverio Avila-S. 2,3
image
Nuria Gomez-Casanovas 6,7
William E Pinchak 8
image
1. Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, USA
2. Rangeland, Wildlife & Fisheries Management, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, Alpine, 79830, USA
3. Research , Borderlands Research Institute, Alpine, 79830, USA
4. Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, USA
5. Southern Plains Climate Hub, USDA-ARS, El Reno, 73036, USA
6. Regenerative System Ecology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center, Vernon, 76384, USA
7. Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management, Texas A&M University, Vernon, 76384, USA
8. Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center, Vernon, 76384, USA
Abstract

Quantifying the amount and spatial distribution of forage mass is critical for managing and enhancing rangeland health and ecosystem services. Remote sensing allows for landscape-level estimations of forage mass, requiring less labor and time in the field than traditional vegetation collection. Our objective is to quantify forage mass and forage production at a fine scale over larger extents with drones and compare to field measurements. We evaluate the capacity of drones to provide improved forage mass estimations on an operational scale in the Southern Great Plains. To quantify forage mass, we collected 1.5 cm resolution Red–Green–Blue (RGB) drone imagery to generate a canopy height model (CHM) at a 7 cm resolution at three Texas, USA, locations throughout the growing season: Vernon (site 1: 94 ha, 678 mm average annual precipitation) and Sweetwater (site 2: 51 ha, site 3: 99 ha; 592 mm average annual precipitation). We collected 30 vegetation clippings per location per sampling event. Vegetation clippings were dried and weighed to estimate forage mass, then compared to forage volume estimated from the CHMs using linear regression. We also developed a framework for a supervised, object-based image classification, which was used to remove woody cover and provide an adjusted forage mass estimation. R² values ranged from 0.3585 to 0.6182 in site 1, from 0.6368 to 0.7844 in site 2, and from 0.3752 to 0.8065 in site 3. Overall accuracy of image classifications ranged from 85.6 to 99.9% for site 1; 95.9% to 99.5% for site 2; and 96.8% to 99.5% for site 3. We estimate total adjusted forage mass for each one of these sites. This work provides a framework for landscape-scale estimation of forage mass that can help livestock producers and land managers adjust stocking rates to maintain or improve rangeland health and wildlife habitat. 

Keywords
remote sensing
rangelands
biomass
image classification
forage production
adaptive management
Bitemporal Integration of Spectral Indices Obtained from UAS–Sentinel-2 Images for the Estimation and Spatial Analysis of Maize Yield
Drone-Derived Vegetation Responses to a Rainfall Pulse in a Semi-Arid Rangeland