EventsDIGITALISATION FOR A SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY
Published
This submission belongs to the session Conference ICPI 2017. Third International Conference on Philosophy of Information of the event DIGITALISATION FOR A SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY
Published date
08 Jun, 2017
Citation
Marcin J. Schroeder, The Case of Artificial vs. Natural Intelligence: Philosophy of Information as a Witness, Prosecutor, Attorney or Judge?, in Proceedings of DIGITALISATION FOR A SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY, Gothenburg, 12 June–16 June 2017, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, doi: 10.3390/IS4SI-2017-03972
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

The Case of Artificial vs. Natural Intelligence: Philosophy of Information as a Witness, Prosecutor, Attorney or Judge?

image
1. Akita International University, Japan
Abstract

The relationship between artificial and natural, human intelligence becomes currently an issue of the primary importance for the world. The threats of technological singularity in the form of ultraintelligent machines occupied many philosophers, but thus far nobody paid attention to the encroaching singularity of relatively low level automation which eliminates need for low skill labor force and threatens wide masses of human population. Economists predict that many occupations regarded as requiring high skills will become spurious too. The only solution for the optimal coexistence of the artificial and natural intelligence is in the reform of education. The solution does not require anything new as the liberal arts education promoted human intellectual development leading to the roles which machines least likely can assume.

Keywords
Artificial Intelligence
Natural intelligence
Automation
Information technology
Education reform.
Manuscript
The Social Obligations of the Cued Self in the Age of Advertising
The Magic Power of Information:The Inner Drive of the Development of Information Society