EventsThe 1st International Electronic Conference on Biological Diversity, Ecology and Evolution
Published
This submission belongs to the session i. Biodiversity Loss and Dynamics of the event The 1st International Electronic Conference on Biological Diversity, Ecology and Evolution
Published date
12 Mar, 2021
Citation
Lucia Varaldo, Davide Dagnino, Maria Guerrina, Luigi Minuto, Gabriele Casazza, Can Species Distributions Models Help to Design Conservation Strategies for Narrow-Ranged Species under Climate Change? A Case Study from Santolina Genus †, in Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Biological Diversity, Ecology and Evolution, 15 March–31 March 2021, MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, doi: 10.3390/BDEE2021-09406
Share
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Can Species Distributions Models Help to Design Conservation Strategies for Narrow-Ranged Species under Climate Change? A Case Study from Santolina Genus

Davide Dagnino 1
Luigi Minuto 1
1. Department for the Earth, Environment and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genoa, Corso Europa 26, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Abstract

Climate change is dramatically threatening biodiversity. Narrowly distributed species are especially exposed to extinction risk due to their narrow ecological niche. We used Species Distribution Models at fine spatial resolution (50m) to investigate changes in the distribution of three range-restricted species of Santolina endemic to the Mediterranean Basin (S. decumbens, S. ligustica, S. pinnata). We assessed the future potential range under an optimistic and a pessimistic scenario, and analysed distribution change taking into account three different ranges: the distributional range (calculated as convex hull), an area 5 km larger than the distributional range, and a buffer (1 km) around occurrences. Santolina ligustica is expected to dramatically reduce its range under both scenarios, Santolina decumbens is expected to increase its range under both scenarios and Santolina pinnata is expected to dramatically reduce its range under the pessimistic scenario and to increase it under the optimistic one. Moreover, in the optimistic scenario, S. ligustica and S. pinnata show a very high range loss in all areas but the range gain is higher in the largest area than in the other two areas. This result suggests that, in the future, suitable areas will occur mainly outside of the current distributional range and that assisted colonization may be necessary to assure species survival. Differently, the third species has a lower range loss and higher range gain within the distributional range and in the buffer around occurrences, suggesting the possibility of survival in microrefugia within its distributional range despite a wide reduction in suitable habitat. These results might help to design strategies for species conservation in face of future climate change.

Keywords
Biodiverisity loss
Climate change
Species distribution models
Manuscript
Investigating the Diversity of the Terrestrial Invertebrate Fauna of Antarctica: A Closer Look at the Stereotydeus (Acari: Prostigmata) Genus
Sequence-Related Amplified Polymorphism (SRAP) Markers: A Feasible Tool for Studies in Invasion Genetics of Freshwater Fish