Please login first
Discrete Elliptic Boundary Value Problems Defined by Symbolic Pseudodifferential Operators
1  Department of Applied mathematics and computer modeling, Institute of engineering and digital technology, Belgorod National research University, 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, 308015, Russia
Academic Editor: Michel Chipot

Abstract:

Abstract

This paper presents a symbolic framework for the analysis of discrete elliptic boundary value problems on lattice domains. Discrete symbol classes, a notion of ellipticity, and compatible boundary operators are introduced. By extending the theory of pseudodifferential operators to the discrete setting, elliptic difference operators are formulated via their symbols on the dual torus, and ellipticity is characterized through principal symbol estimates. Using Vasil’ev’s wave factorization method, adapted to discrete symbols, we construct parametrices and establish well-posedness of discrete boundary value problems.

Introduction

Discrete analogues of pseudodifferential operators arise naturally in numerical analysis and discrete physical models. While elliptic boundary value problems in the continuous setting are well understood, their discrete counterparts require specialized analytical tools. Symbolic pseudodifferential calculus provides a natural framework for studying ellipticity, boundary conditions, and regularity, motivating its extension to lattice-based operators.

Methodology

The analysis is carried out on discrete domains Ωh⊂Zn. Discrete pseudodifferential operators are defined using the discrete Fourier transform and suitable symbol classes. Boundary value problems are formulated by coupling interior difference operators with boundary operators acting on the discrete boundary. Ellipticity is defined through principal symbol estimates, allowing for the construction of parametrices within the discrete symbolic calculus.

Results

The main result shows that elliptic difference operators admit parametrices obtained via wave factorization of their symbols. This approach yields a discrete analogue of the Lopatinski–Shapiro condition and implies Fredholm properties, as well as existence, uniqueness, and regularity of solutions, even for irregular lattice boundaries.

Conclusion

This work establishes a rigorous symbolic theory for discrete elliptic boundary value problems. By adapting Vasil’ev’s wave factorization to the discrete setting, the paper bridges continuous pseudodifferential theory and discrete models, providing a solid analytical foundation for stability analysis and numerical methods for elliptic problems on lattices.

Keywords: Discrete elliptic operators, Pseudodifferential operators, Symbolic calculus, Wave factorization, Boundary value problems, Lattice domains
Comments on this paper
Currently there are no comments available.


 
 
Top