Please login first
Proposals for science education in early years: implications for teacher training
* ,
1  University of Valencia, Valencia, 46010, Spain
Academic Editor: Daniel Muijs

Abstract:

Early childhood teacher training in Spain prepares educational professionals to work with children from birth to six years old. This stage is divided into two cycles: the first (from 0-2 years) and the second (from 3 to 6 years). Therefore, anyone trained in this field should possess professional skills across this entire age range. However, reality shows a bias towards training geared towards the older children (4-5 years). This is due to multiple factors, but primarily stems from the specific characteristics of children at these ages and the limited research on this period of human development. In this paper, we aim to present some science-based learning activities implemented with 1- and 2-year-olds. These activities were developed within a broader research project on science education in early childhood, involving university researchers, teachers, and educators working with this age group. The results show that it is possible to begin working on scientific processes at these ages by taking into account their individual characteristics. To illustrate this, we present two specific experiments: scientific diapers and the cardboard city. In the first, diapers were used as a familiar object to explore scientific concepts with 2-year-olds, and in the second, we were able to observe the differences between 1- and 2-year-olds. These results are fundamental for initial teacher training, since future teachers must also possess scientific competencies relevant to these age groups.

Keywords: early childhood education; teacher training; early years; 0-2 years old
Comments on this paper
Antonio Torralba-Burrial
Dear José and Almudena,

The educational experiences that you present for learning science in the first cycle of early childhood education are very interesting. Regarding the reasons why examples in early childhood teacher training university grade are biased towards the second cycle, I think it's important to add that the vast majority of students are preparing to teach in that second cycle, with most first-cycle early childhood teachers coming from vocational training programs, not from university degrees in early childhood education. At least in my experience, the students who express a desire to focus their professional development on the first cycle of early childhood education are already practicing early childhood educators with vocational training qualifications, who want to access the scarcest and best-paid positions for early childhood teachers in the first cycle. Is it different in your universities?

Best wishes,

Antonio.



 
 
Top