The Navier-Stokes (NS) equations are 200 years old. There are many papers and books on the NS equations. The topic of this meeting: Is the Navier-Stokes problem (NSP) in R3 physically and mathematically correct? This is a new formulation of one of the millennium problems. What does physical correctness mean? It means that there are no consequences of the basic equations that contradict physical assumptions. What does mathematical correctness mean? It means that the solution to the NSP exists in some space X for all times, is unique in X and is smooth if the data are smooth.

My goal at this meeting is to prove that the NSP problem is neither physically nor mathematically is correct. This proof mathematically correct sketched in my papers [1–4].

References
[1] A.G.Ramm, The Navier-Stokes problem, Morgan&Claypool publishers, 2021.
[2] A.G.Ramm, Theory of hyper-singular integrals and its application to the Navier-Stokes problem, Contrib. Math.,2, (2020), 47-54. open access journal
[3] A.G.Ramm, Comments on the Navier-Stokes problem, Axioms, (2021), 10, 95. open access journal
[4] A.G.Ramm, Navier-Stokes equations paradox, Reports on Mathematical Physics, 88, N.1, (2021), 41-45.