To acknowledge the support of the conference esteemed authors and recognize their outstanding scientific accomplishments, we are pleased to launch the following two awards.
Description
Best Abstract Award Winners
1. Title: Analysis of a new SolWat photochemical-photovoltaic system with wastewater cooling on the front surface of the photovoltaic module as a possible tertiary treatment in a WWTP
Authors: Julia Torres López, Marta Vivar García, Manuel Fuentes Conde, Ana María Palacios Villa
2. Title: A monthly water balance model for assessing streamflow uncertainty in hydrologic studies
Authors: Lampros Vasiliades, Ioannis Mastraftsis
3. Title: Automatic and Non-Invasive Monitoring of Vineyards Water Stress
Authors: Pietro Brach del Prever, Gabriele Balducci, Alice Ballestra, Carlo Ghiglione, Laura Mascheretti, Margherita Molinari, Giuseppe Nicoletti, Valter Carvelli, Chiara Corbari, Stefano Invernizzi , Stefano Mariani
Each winner will receive a prize of CHF 500, and a voucher of 400 CHF to cover the paper's Article Processing Charge in Water. The winner will be assessed by the Conference Committee.
Number of awards available
3
Description
Best Presentation Award Winners
1. Title: Optimized chlorine bulk decay models and a machine-learning-guided water quality responsive kinetic model for residual chlorine prediction
Authors: Iman Jafari, Rongmo Luo, Fang Yee Lim, Szu Hui Ng, Jiangyong Hu
2. Title: Prediction and classification of flood susceptibility based on historic record in a large, diverse, and data sparse country
Authors: Heather McGrath, Piper Norah Gohl
3. Title: Enhancement of Atmospheric Water Harvesting via Salt-Infused Sponges and Peltier Devices
Authors: Jaewoong Lee, Eric Jobiliong, Timothy Bastiaan, Darren Johanes Manua, Ezekhiel Taniara, Eden Steven
Each winner will receive a prize of CHF 300, and a voucher of 300 CHF to cover the paper's Article Processing Charge in Water. The winner will be assessed by the Conference Committee.
Number of awards available
3
1. Full paper must be submitted to ECWS-7.
2. The quality of the paper.
3. The scientific content of the paper
Evaluation
1. Each Evaluation Committee member will give an assessment for each paper in terms of the criteria outlined above.
2. The score for each paper will be ranked, from highest to lowest.
3. If two or more papers get the same score, further evaluation will be carried out.
4. All decisions made by the Evaluation Committee are final.