Event Awards
Guidance for Event Award

To acknowledge the support of the conference’s esteemed authors and recognize their outstanding scientific accomplishments, we are pleased to launch the Best Poster Awards and the Best Oral Presentation Awards.

Best Poster Awards

Description

The Best Poster Awards have been established to recognize the scientific merit exhibited in poster presentation and preparation.

Number of awards available

2

Best Oral Presentation Awards

Description

As a sponsor, Land would like to present two awards for the best presentation, as determined by the conference committee. The recipients of the award will each receive CHF 500. We look forward to reviewing your contributions.

Number of awards available

2

Terms and Conditions
Best Poster Awards

As a sponsor, Land would like to grant two awards (each 500 CHF) for the best poster presented at the conference. This prize will be determined by a jury and awarded to the best-designed poster presented live at the conference.

Posters should have the following information:

  • Title (with authors and affiliations)
  • Introduction/Objectives/Aims
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Acknowledgments
  • Contact information

Presentations will be judged on how well they are able to summarize the content of the work and make the observer interested in viewing the poster. Posters will be judged on clarity quality of appearance.

Best Oral Presentation Awards

As a sponsor, Land would like to present two awards for the best oral presentation, as determined by the conference committee. The recipient of the award will each receive CHF 500. We look forward to reviewing your contributions.

Best Oral Presentation Awards Criteria

Presentations will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

  • Originality and novelty of the submitted file;
  • Significance of content;
  • Scientific soundness;
  • Interest to the readers;
  • English language and style.

Requirements for Best Oral Presentation Awards:

The presentation should contain the following information:

  • Title (with authors and affiliations);
  • Introduction, objectives, and aims;
  • Methods;
  • Results;
  • Conclusion;
  • References;
  • Acknowledgements;
  • Contact information;
  • A live presentation within 20 minutes.

Evaluation

  • Each Evaluation Committee member will assess each entry in terms of the criteria outlined above;
  • Total scores for each presentation will be ranked, from highest to lowest;
  • If two or more authors get the same score, further evaluation will be carried out;

All decisions made by the Evaluation Committee are final.


Powered by Sciforum
Disclaimer
Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyAccessibility