Hero Image

Peer Review Week 2023: A Roundtable Discussion on the Future of Peer Review

28 September 2023
14:00 (CEST)
Online

Welcome from
the chair

Welcome to MDPI's Peer Review Week 2023 Webinar—a part of the global celebration of peer-review's vital role in maintaining research quality. We are pleased to present this roundtable discussion, moderated by Dr. Ioana Craciun from MDPI's Scientific Office Board, featuring a panel of researchers.

This year, we join the global scholarly community in exploring "Peer Review and The Future of Publishing" a theme chosen through a global poll to represent the collective voice of the academic world.

The landscape of scholarly publishing is evolving, driven by new policies, advanced technologies, and a commitment to transparency. We are witnessing developments, including the drive for free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research in the United States by 2026 and the impending implementation of Plan S, which will reshape transformative agreements.

Amidst these advancements, tools like ChatGPT are revolutionizing scholarly communication, opening a new realm of ethical challenges and practical considerations. Non-article research outputs, such as data, methods, and code, are becoming citable artifacts, enriching the scientific record. However, peer reviewers are facing increased demands on their time and expertise, making it more challenging to secure reviewers.

While these shifts are reshaping scholarly publishing, the core value of peer review remains largely unchanged. Peer review is the primary means of assessing research rigor, credibility, and potential. However, as the publishing landscape evolves, we must consider the implications for the practice of peer review and its practitioners.

Join us for this roundtable discussion where our panelists will share their experiences and insights into the future publishing and essential role of peer review.

The main topics for discussion will include:

  • Changes in scholarly publishing and their effect on peer review
  • Technological advancements and their influence on peer review.
  • The evolving needs of reviewers in these changing times.
  • Exploring different peer-review models and the future.

Date: 28 September 2023

Time: 14:00 CEST | 08:00 EDT | 20:00 CST



Meet Our Speakers

Mr. Agbotiname Imoize

Mr. Agbotiname Imoize

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria.;
Agbotiname Lucky Imoize is a lecturer in the Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering at the University of Lagos, Nigeria. His research interests cover the fields of 6G wireless communication, wireless security systems, and artificial intelligence. He is a Fulbright research fellow, DAAD research scholar, the vice chair of the IEEE Communication Society, Nigeria chapter, and a registered engineer with the Council for the Regulation of Engineering in Nigeria (COREN). He is a senior member of the IEEE.

Dr. Haipeng Liu

Dr. Haipeng Liu

Research Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom;
Dr Haipeng Liu is a research fellow on healthcare technology at Coventry University, UK. His research areas include computational simulation of cardiovascular system, bio-signal processing, and wearable sensor development. He has published 64 research papers (index: 17) and delivered 10+ invited talks/keynote lectures for universities, research institutes, and academic conferences. He has the memberships of World Stroke Organization and Chinese Stroke Association. He is currently a supervisor of three PhD students on healthcare technologies, and keeps exploring new pathways of multidimensional international collaboration.

Prof. Dr. Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto

Prof. Dr. Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto

Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Core Facility, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul;
Prof. Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto is a molecular biologist and science editor with extensive editorial experience in leading positions. Pabulo is Editor-in-Chief of the Book Series "Grand Challenges in Biology and Biotechnology", as well as Section Editor-in-Chief of "Life" (Section Microbiology).

Dr. Marcin Kulawiak

Dr. Marcin Kulawiak

Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunication and Informatics, Dept. of Geoinformatics, Gdansk, Poland;
Marcin Kulawiak is an Associate Professor at the Department of Geoinformatics, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology. An expert in Geoinformatics, he has played a leading role in several international R&D projects oriented around dynamic dissemination and analysis of geographic data of nautical, land and aerial origin. His publication record consists of over forty journal articles, presentations on international conferences and co-authored monographs. In his research he has cooperated with international scientific consortia as well as private businesses. He is member of the Editorial Boards of Frontiers in Earth Science and ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information.

Sponsors and Partners

Organizer


MDPI
Webinar Recording

Peer Review Week 2023: A Roundtable Discussion on the Future of Peer Review

(28 September 2023)

The MDPI's Peer Review Week 2023 Webinar took place on 28 Sep 2023, 14:00 (CEST) and it featured a discussion on the importance of peer review in the scientific community.
The Webinar Chair, Dr. Ioana Craciun, from MDPI, introduced four panelists, who shared their insights. The distinguished panelists were:

- Prof. Dr. Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto from the Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Core Facility, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
- Dr. Marcin Kulawiak
from Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunication and Informatics, Dept. of Geoinformatics, Gdansk, Poland
- Dr. Haipeng Liu
from the Research Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom
- Mr. Agbotiname Imoize
, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria.

The first topic touched upon how reviewers should address the need for more transparency in data sharing and the use of repositories. It was emphasized that publishing original/raw data is crucial to prevent manipulation, and there was a suggestion that reviewers should advocate for data placement in repositories. However, there were concerns about anonymizing some data such as medical data or personal for repositories, highlighting the complexities involved. The discussion then explored the challenges faced by young reviewers in evaluating datasets, with a suggestion that publishers should provide guidelines to assist them.

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in peer review was discussed, following a question from the audience, with the consensus being that AI could serve as a pre-screening tool but has limitations in checking certain details. The evolving nature of AI and its potential to generate random scientific information, not pertaining to the manuscript being reviewed, were also noted. The panelists discussed tools to alleviate the reviewer workload, such as AI tools for finding similar research and checking references. One panelist appreciated MDPI for conducting preliminary checks with software for plagiarism, grammar, editing, and proofreading, which saves time for reviewers.

Recognition for reviewers was another important topic that emerged after a question from the audience. Suggestions included awards, monetary incentives, and discounts on publication fees as ways to acknowledge reviewers' efforts. A voucher system tied to review quality was also proposed. Maintaining consistency in quality reviews was discussed, with a recommendation for thorough reading and understanding of the paper before providing comments.

The detection of predatory journals, another touched topic following an attendees question, was highlighted through quick review processes, promises of rapid acceptance, lack of proper indexing, and simplistic review comments.

The webinar was concluded on the reflection that the future of peer review is also linked to transparency of journals with regards their metrics, such as impact factors and listing in databases, as indicators of trustworthy journals which also can give an indication of where quality peer review practices are fostered.
Content Locked
You need to log in and have a confirmed registration to view this content.

Powered by Sciforum
Disclaimer
Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyAccessibility