Please login first
Cross-Linguistic Differences in Healthy Speakers: A Comparative Study of English, Chinese, and Italian Groups.
* 1 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9, 10 , 11 , 12 , 13, 14, 15 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 2 , 3, 19, 20 , 3, 19, 20
1  IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
2  Institute for Advanced Studies, IUSS, Pavia, Italy
3  Memory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
4  Memory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
5  University of Texas Austin, Austin, USA.
6  Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Memory Unit
7  Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C
8  Department of Special Education and Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
9  Department of Psychiatry, Prince of Wales Hospital and ShaTin Hospital, Hong Kong
10  Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
11  Department of Neurology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan
12  Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
13  Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina
14  Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
15  Departamento de Lingüística y Literatura, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
16  University of Antwerpen, Belgium
17  University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
18  Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA;
19  Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
20  Department of Neurology, Dyslexia Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA;
Academic Editor: Pierluigi Zoccolotti

Abstract:

Introduction: Cross-linguistic studies offer unique and new insights into the relationship between language and cognition and the impact of linguistic differences on the diagnostic process in neurological conditions. However, differences in speech production among healthy speakers have been scarcely investigated. We aim to address cross-linguistic variability in the connected speech production of English, Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese), and Italian speakers using a picture description task.

Methods: Thirty-nine sex-, age-, and education-matched subjects (thirteen for each language) described the Picnic scene from the WAB battery. Twenty-eight linguistic features encompassing phonological, lexico-semantic, morpho-syntactic, and discourse/pragmatic domains were then coded using a semi-automated computerized language analysis program (CLAN). The frequency of each feature was compared across the three groups.

Results: While the majority of features were similar across languages, we identified differences among English, Chinese, and Italian speakers. Specifically, we found reduced production of prepositions, conjunctions, and pronouns, and increased adverb use in the Chinese-speaking group compared to the groups speaking the other two languages. English participants produced a higher proportion of prepositions, while Italian speakers produced significantly more conjunctions and empty pauses than the other groups.

Conclusions: Our results support the role of cross-linguistic studies in capturing language-specific nuances in spoken production and highlight the need for linguistically tailored tools for the assessment of language performance.

Keywords: cross-linguistic study; connected speech; English language; Chinese language; Italian language.

 
 
Top