Please login first
Mucoadhesion ability of protein and starch from lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) seeds, relative to milk casein, gelatine and gum arabic as well-recognized mucoadhesive biopolymers
1 , * 2, 3, 4 , 2, 5 , * 1
1  Centre of Excellence in Agri-food Technologies, National Centre for Food Manufacturing, College of Sciences, University of Lincoln, Holbeach, Spalding, PE12 7FJ, United Kingdom
2  China-Ireland International Cooperation Center for Food Material Science and Structure Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002 Fuzhou, China
3  College of Food Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 15 Shangxiadian Road, 350002 Fuzhou, China
4  Institute of Food Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 18 Simon Pit Road, 350002 Fuzhou, China
5  Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
Academic Editor: Moktar Hamdi

Abstract:

This study investigated the mucoadhesive properties of two polysaccharides [lotus seed starch (LS) and gum Arabic (GA)] and three proteins [lotus seed protein (LP), casein (CA), and gelatine (G)]. Different in vitro tests were carried-out to study the biopolymeric mucin interactions including mucin adsorption assay, turbidity development over 6 hours, and viscosity increase ("force of bioadhesion"). The free thiol content of proteins was also measured as one of the underlying mechanisms for adhesion. The biopolymers were studied at different concentrations (0.25-1% for polysaccharides and 2-10% for proteins, except G, which was studied at 1-5% due to its high gelling capacity). The effect of biopolymer modification on its ability as a mucoadhesive was also studied. Proteins underwent thermal treatment (H, 85⁰C/30 min), ultrasounds (US, 50% amplitude at 40⁰C/30 min), or heating followed by ultrasounds (H+US), while polysaccharides were treated with US only. The results showed a descending order of mucoadhesion: GA > LS > CA > G > LP. GA and CA had higher mucin adsorption than LP and LS. Increasing LP concentration decreased mucoadhesion, while CA increased adhesion, peaking at 10% protein content. However, gelatine showed maximum adhesion at 3%, which declined at higher concentrations; GA and LS had optimal mucin adsorption at 0.5%, with no improvement beyond this concentration. In addition, Casein's higher thiol content correlated with stronger mucoadhesion. Intact or heat-treated gelatine had high mucoadhesion, unlike US or H+US treatments, which reduced it. However, US treatment increased LS's ability to bind mucin, while LP showed no significant changes with any treatment. Therefore, these findings suggest the potential for using mucoadhesive biopolymers in food applications to prolong retention time on the mucosa, aiding in salt reduction without compromising taste.

Keywords: Mucoadhesion; protein; polysaccharides; reduce salt
Top