In northern Thailand, devastating landslides and debris flow frequently occur after heavy rainfalls. This study focused on the evaluation of debris flow using the DFLOWZ and Debris-2D models. The data collected from the failure at Santisuk-Bo Kluea (No. 1081) road on 27 July 2018 were used to validate the model results. The total debris flow volume that occurred at the Santisuk-Bo Kluea (No. 1081) road was estimated using the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) analysis. The actual deposition and affected areas were depicted using aerial photos to validate simulated deposition areas. As a result, it is indicated that the DFLOWZ model provides a better agreement compared to the actual deposited area. It was found that the differences in the deposition area and the overlapping deposition area obtained from the DFLOWZ model are 16% and 34%, respectively. For the Debris-2D model with the minimum yield stress of 8000 Pa, the differences in the deposition area and the overlapping deposition area are 51% and 16%, respectively. It should be noted that prudential input parameters should be selected with caution. Especially, the yield stress, which is the main factor for the Debris-2D model, should be obtained from the testing suggested by Liu and Huang (2006)
Previous Article in event
Previous Article in session
Next Article in event
Evaluation of DFLOWZ and Debris-2D Models Using Road No. 1081 Km. 90 Data in Northern, Thailand
Published:
22 November 2022
by MDPI
in OHOW 2022 – The 1st International Symposium on One Health, One World
session Urban Safety and Disaster Mitigation
https://doi.org/10.3390/ohow2022-13731
(registering DOI)
Abstract:
Keywords: Debris flow, DEM analysis, DFLOWZ model, Debris-2D model