Please login first
Microstructure and Hydrophobicity of the Wing Surface of Some Moths
1 , 2 , * 1 , * 1, 2
1  Tianjin Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Animal Diversity, College of Life Sciences, Tianjin Normal University, Binshui West Road 393, Xiqing District, Tianjin 300387, China
2  Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
Academic Editor: Chuchu Li

Abstract:

Introduction

Aquatic moths of Lepidoptera, Crambidae, and Acentropinae inhabit moist environments. For example, the larvae of genus Eoophyla all live in streams, and their wing surfaces are highly hydrophobic after a long period of evolution. Currently, there are only some sporadic reports on the classification and agricultural control of aquatic moths, and reports on hydrophobic properties and their surface scales are very limited.

Methods

We used a contact angle measuring instrument and SEM to study the hydrophobicity and microstructure of three aquatic moths Eoophyla ochripicta , E. menglensis, and E. melanops (Crambidae, Acentropinae) and a non-aquatic moth Conogethes punctiferalis (Crambidae, Pyraustinae).

Results

Our research results show that the wing surfaces of all three aquatic Eoophyla moths have strong hydrophobicity, and the contact angle of the minimum water drop volume was 15 µL (ranging from 139.3° to 143.0°), but the contact angle of the non-aquatic moth was only 133.9°. The microstructures of the wing surfaces of the three aquatic Eoophyla moths are similar: the surface of the scales consists of sub-micron longitudinal ridges and laterally connected ribs, and the spacing between the longitudinal ribs is 0.8~1.69 µm, exhibiting a grid shape. Conversely, the laterally connected ribs of C. punctiferalis are incomplete.

Conclusions

Due to the presence of the wing surface microstructure of aquatic moths, and because the scale of the structure is much smaller than the diameter of the droplet, this leads to the formation of air pockets under the droplets, which are unable to fully fill the grooves of the surface. Thus, the wing surface exhibits stronger hydrophobicity. However, the microstructure of C. punctiferalis can make water droplets have more contact with the wing surface, so the hydrophobicity is less favorable than that of aquatic Eoophyla moths. Researching the relationship between the hydrophobic properties of the wing surface and its structure can provide an experimental and theoretical basis for the preparation of hydrophobic biomimetic materials.

Keywords: Keywords: aquatic moths, wing surface, microstructure, hydrophobicity

 
 
Top