Please login first
Importance of studying regional biodiversity of benthic marine diatoms and cyanobacteria for bioindication of organic pollution in marine environments
* 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2
1  A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS
2  Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Academic Editor: Paulo Vale

Published: 15 October 2024 by MDPI in The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Diversity session Marine Diversity
Abstract:

Water quality monitoring using data on the biodiversity of living organisms has been employed for a long time. A saprobic system based on lists of organic pollution indicator species has been developed for freshwaters, but one has not yet been established for marine waters. Benthic diatoms and cyanobacteria are known bioindicators. The aim of this study was to assess the diversity of benthic diatoms and cyanobacteria in the epilithon of the three areas with different levels of eutrophication in Sevastopol Bay, Black Sea, for their use in general water quality assessment. The pollution of three areas of the bay was determined according to long-term hydrochemical data, as follows: Martynova Bay (MB)—relatively clean, Inkerman Bay (IB)—moderately polluted, Yuzhnaya Bay (YuB)—heavily polluted. The following indices of diversity were determined: Margalef (D), Shannon (H), Berger–Parker (IBP). The saprobic index was calculated according to Pantle and Buck's (S) method modified by Sládeček, using species significance indices (s) from the literature.

A total of 63 diatoms and 20 cyanobacteria species were found in Sevastopol Bay; among them, 21 and 6 were saprobionts, respectively. Based on diversity indices, it was found that the most favorable conditions for both diatoms (H=2.65; D=7.67; IBP=0.28) and cyanobacteria (H=1.83; D=2.2; IBP = 0.25) were in MB. The worst conditions were formed in the YuB: for diatoms, H=2.24; D=5.17; IBP=0.28; for cyanobacteria, H=1.04; D=0.67; IBP=0.5.

The diatom saprobic index showed that waters of MB are β-mesosaprobic: SMB = 1.9. Meanwhile, SYuB = 2.2 (β-α-mesosaprobic) and SIB=2.5 (α-mesosaprobic). Therefore, the IB area is the most polluted, which is not in accordance with the obtained diversity indices and hydrochemical data. For cyanobacteria, the results of the estimations were also not consistent. Consequently, it is necessary to create a checklist of diatoms and cyanobacteria to calculate indices of indicator species with consideration of regional features.

Keywords: Bioindication; diatoms; cyanobacteria; marine diversity; indicator species; organic pollution; saprobic index
Comments on this paper
Sergey Kapranov
The authors apply the system of biodiversity and saprobicity indices and diversity of microalgal organic pollution indicators to the case of seawater in marginal bays within Sevastopol Bay (southwestern Crimea, Black Sea). The application of diversity indices is comprehensive enough and the approach of applying the saprobic system of microalgal species to seawater quality seems novel. I would recommend trying to further correlate these indices with one or several hydrochemical parameters, taking into special account dissolved organic matter.
 
Dear Sergey,
Thank you for your attention and appreciation of our work.
In our study, we used long-term data on hydrochemical parameters of the studied water area. We studied indicator properties of benthic organisms, which reflect long-term rather than temporal changes. The purpose of this study was to show the necessity of studying the influence of regional conditions on the indicator properties of species. Therefore, in order to accurately determine the indicator characteristics of a particular species, we plan to simultaneously monitor hydrochemical parameters in the future.



 
 
Top