Please login first
Magnetic Variations in Nanoakageneite as Indicators of Arsenate Adsorption
* 1, 2 , 1, 2 , 1, 2 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 6, 7 , 8 , 8 , * 1, 2
1  Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria, S.S. 554 bivio per Sestu, 09042, Monserrato, Italy
2  National Interuniversity Consortium for Materials Science and Technology (INSTM), Cagliari Unit, Via Giusti 9, 50121, Firenze, Italy
3  European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 71 Avenue des Martyrs, CS 40220, 38043 Cedex 9, Grenoble, France
4  CNR - Nanoscience Institute, Via G. Campi 213/A, 41125, Modena, Italy
5  Italian Institute of Technology, Via Morego 30, 16163, Genova, Italy
6  Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 2030/8, 128 43 Prague 2, Prague, Czech Republic
7  Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Ke Karlovu 3, 121 16 Prague 2, Prague, Czech Republic
8  Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dolejškova 2155/3, 182 23, Prague, Czech Republic
Academic Editor: José Luis Arias Mediano

Abstract:

Iron oxi(hydroxi)des are known to be efficient sorbents toward arsenic species, thanks to the formation of complexes of the inner sphere, through ligand exchange of surface -OH2 and -OH. with the arsenic species in the coordination sphere of the structural Fe atoms.[1] Recently, we compared the sorption ability of different iron oxi(hydroxi)des, namely akaganeite (β-FeOOH), ferrihydrite (referred to as Fe5HO8∙4H2O), and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3, as a bare and silica-based composite), toward arseniate/arsenite species in spiked aqueous solutions.[2] Akaganeite was proved to be the best sorbent for arseniate anions (89 mg g -1 at pH0 3, 52 mg g-1 at pH0 8) and also an efficient one for arsenite species (91 mg g-1 at pH0 3–8), thanks to its high positive surface charge (measured by Electrophoretic Light Scattering, ELS, ≈30 mV) and high surface area (determined by N2 physisorption, ≈200 m2 g-1 ). To investigate the adsorption process and the interaction between arseniate/arsenite and akageneite, different methods, such as powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), infrared spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR), transmission electron microscopy also in high resolution (HRTEM) and coupled with chemical probes (EDX-EELS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray absorption (XAS), and DC magnetometry, were adopted. None of these techniques were able to detect any changes in the sorbent properties upon adsorption, except for FTIR-ATR and DC magnetometry. In particular, the interaction between akageneite and arseniate species was found to produce a distinctive change in the magnetism of the sorbent, with the appearance of a second band in the temperature profile of the magnetisation, whose associated intensity increased with increasing adsorbate amount. This work demonstrates the high sensitivity of DC magnetometry in exploring surface phenomena in iron-bearing materials.

[1] A. Jain, et al Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 1179–1184.

[2] M. Sanna Angotzi, et al, Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 326, 1-22.

Keywords: akaganeite; magnetism; arsenic
Top