Please login first
CO₂ Capture on Amine-Modified Mesostructured Silicas: A Comparative Study with Metal–Organic Frameworks
* 1, 2 , 1, 2 , 1, 2 , 1, 2 , 3 , 2, 4 , 1, 2 , 1, 2 , * 1, 2
1  Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Cagliari, S.S 554 Bivio per Sestu, 09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy
2  National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM), Florence, Italy
3  Eni S.p.A., TECH-R&D, Via Felice Maritano 26, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
4  Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino (TO), Italy
Academic Editor: Marco Stoller

Abstract:

Within the Carbon Capture and Utilization technologies framework, porous materials—such as Ordered Mesostructured Silicas (OMSs) and Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs)—are promising sorbents for CO2 capture due to their high adsorption capacities, ease of regeneration, and stability. This work focuses on a comparison between two classes of hybrid organic–inorganic adsorbents for CO2 capture: amino-modified OMSs and MOFs. Among the OMSs, two MCM-41 samples composed of 100–500nm particles with 3 nm mesopores were synthesized using different silicon sources: TEOS (tetraethyl orthosilicate) and FSA (fluorosilicic acid) derived from industrial waste. Owing to their high surface area resulting from their mesostructure, these materials are well-suited for surface functionalization to improve CO₂ adsorption. In this study, both samples were functionalized with (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane, yielding NH₂@TEOS-MCM-41 and NH₂@FSA-MCM-41. For comparison a 3D ultramicroporous MOF based on a benzoquinone derivative—3,6-N-ditriazolyl-2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinone (trz₂An)—coordinated with cobalt(II) (CoMOF) was proposed. Its pore size (3.4 Å) enables selective CO₂ separation via size-dependent adsorption (molecular sieving), as this dimension closely match the kinetic diameter of CO₂. CO2 capture performance was assessed through dynamic adsorption tests using 5–10% CO2 in N2. At 10% CO₂ and 30 °C, NH₂@TEOS-MCM-41 showed a higher uptake (~1000 μmol/g) than CoMOF (~700 μmol/g), with the difference becoming more pronounced at 5% CO₂: ~829 μmol/g and ~317 μmol/g respectively. Conversely, CoMOF offered easier regeneration at room temperature under N2, whereas NH2@TEOS-MCM-41 required also heating at 120 °C. The different performances arise mainly from their distinct CO2 adsorption mechanisms: chemisorption for NH2@TEOS-MCM-41, forming ammonium carbamates through interactions between amino groups and CO2 and physisorption for CoMOF, governed by weak intermolecular forces with MOF’s porous surface. The adsorption heats derived from microcalorimetry and the FTIR confirm the mentioned mechanisms. Additionally, NH2@FSA-MCM-41, synthesized from FSA with similar amine loading, showed even better performance: ~1000 μmol/g (5% CO2) and ~1200 μmol/g (10% CO2).

Keywords: CO2 capture; Metal-Organic Frameworks; Ordered Mesostructured Silicas; CO2 adsorption mechanisms
Top