Please login first
Error Correction Using Bayesian GRU Network in Hybrid Visual Inertial Navigation System
* 1 , 1 , 1 , 2
1  Cranfield University, Bedford, United Kingdom
2  Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al-Khobar, KSA
Academic Editor: Tomasz Hadas

Published: 02 October 2025 by MDPI in European Navigation Conference 2025 topic PNT Resilience and Robustness
Abstract:

Vision-based navigation systems (VINS) are increasingly utilised as an alternative to GNSS for UAVs operating in urban environments but suffers from performance degradation under visual fault conditions like illumination variation, rapid motion, texture-less environments, and weather effects. While hybrid architecture incorporating Kalman filters and machine learning (ML) improves performance, they often lack evidence of providing contingency for non-Gaussian error distributions, limiting operational safety. To address these shortcomings, an enhanced hybrid VINS architecture is proposed featuring a Bayesian GRU-based error correction network (B-GRU) providing a contingency while compensating model errors. To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first attempt to estimate uncertainty using B-GRU compensator while addressing data uncertainty for VINS applications. The system architecture integrates an Error-State Kalman Filter (ESKF) and the B-GRU, compensating for position errors with uncertainty prediction. The proposed approach is validated using datasets from MATLAB incorporated Unreal Engine simulated environment, replicating the complex fault conditions. The ML model is trained on various visual failure modes to adapt the variability in the signal patterns during flights with simulated datasets and tested across varied flight paths and lighting scenarios. Results demonstrate that the fusion strategy effectively corrects erroneous measurements arising from corrupted sensor data and imperfect models and achieves improvement of 78.06% compared to SOTA hybrid VIO in horizontal axis while capturing complex flight dynamics in unseen environment. Comparative analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of B-GRU in mitigating failure modes with predictive error boundary, achieving a 72% improvement in performance compared to the architecture that integrates GRU-based error compensation. This approach shows a step forward in enhancing positioning accuracy and contingency in challenging urban environments.

Keywords: Error compensation; Visual Inertial Odometry; Bayesian GRU; Failure modes; Error State Kalman Filter; Uncertainty
Supplementary material: Download Supplementary material
Top