European Navigation Conference 2024
22–24 May 2024, Noordwijk, Zuid/Holland, The Netherlands
Resilient PNT, Navigation, Positioning, Timing, Autonomy
- Go to the Topics
- Event Details
Welcome from the Chairs
The full event website may be found at the following URL
https://enc-series.org/2024/
This portal is for paper submission and reviews.
Event Organizers

The Royal Institute of Navigation
The Royal Institute of Navigation
The Royal Institute of Navigation is a learned society and a professional body for navigation whose vision is to be an inclusive group of diverse disciplines working together for a more navigable world.
comms@rin.org.uk

European Navigation Conference Foundation
European Navigation Conference Foundation
The ENC Foundation works with the European Group of Institutes of Navigation and its member Institutes to organise the ENC-series of conferences.
https://enc-series.org/2024/
director@rin.org.uk
Event Chairs

Prof Terry Moore OBE is an Emeritus Professor of the University of Nottingham. He was formerly the Director of the Nottingham Geospatial Institute (NGI) at the University, where he was the Professor of Satellite Navigation. He was listed in the 2023 UK New Year Honours List for his services to satellite navigation. Prof Moore is Chair of the European Group of Institutes of Navigation.

Chair, RIN Technical Committee. Founder Focal Point Positioning.
Venue, Travel and Accommodation
Please see https://enc-series.org/2024/ for all event information. This portal is for author paper upload and paper reviews.
List of accepted submissions (81)
Id | Title | Authors | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sciforum-093641 | IEC-61108-7 SBAS Standard for Ship-Borne Receivers: preliminary testing validation activities |
,
Joaquim Fortuny ,
,
,
,
,
|
Show Abstract |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The IEC 61108-7 standard focuses on the minimum performance of shipborne receivers using Satellites Based Augmentation System (SBAS) L1 signals to be compliant to the performances within IMO Resolution A.1046(27). Apart from the minimum performance requirements, the standard specifies testing methods and a full set of scenarios with their pass/fail criteria. To verify the feasibility of the tests defined in the standard, a comprehensive test campaign has been carried out in a joint effort by European Satellite Services Provider (ESSP) and the European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), under the coordination of the European Union Agency for the Space Programme (EUSPA). This paper presents an assessment of the validity and appropriateness of the test scenarios and minimum performance requirements specified in the future IEC-61108-7 standard. To perform the campaign, dedicated setups have been designed and implemented at the JRC and at ESSP laboratories, where live and simulated GPS+SBAS signals have been used. For the analysis, all the Test Cases (TCs) described in the standard were implemented and two commercial devices were tested. From the results, it emerged that all the TCs were properly designed and implemented, therefore confirming the feasibility of the tests defined in IEC 61108-7. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sciforum-097950 | UWB-based positioning is not invulnerable from spoofing attacks: A case study of Crazyswarm |
,
,
Max Brandstätter ,
|
Show Abstract |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spoofing attacks pose a threat to drones that can lead to their crash or takeover. As a countermeasure, the European Space Agency has implemented the Timed Efficient Loss-tolerant Authentication (TESLA) broadcast protocol in the Galileo Open Service Navigation Message Authentication (OSNMA) to detect such events. This study explores the application of TESLA in detecting spoofing attacks targeted at drone swarms that rely on positioning systems utilizing ultra-wideband (UWB) technology. The results of our experiments reaffirm that UWB-based positioning systems are not automatically invulnerable from spoofing attacks and that cryptographic methods such as TESLA are required to provide a layer of protection against spoofing attacks to detect them effectively. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sciforum-096008 | Sensitivity analysis of Galileo OSNMA cross-authentication sequences |
,
Cillian O'Driscoll ,
,
Sofie Pollin
|
Show Abstract |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Galileo Open Service Navigation Message Authentication (OSNMA) has been transmitted stably over the last years and is expected to be declared operationally in the next months. While the protocol is very flexible, most of the parameters, such as key and tag sizes and cryptographic functions, have been already fixed in view of the operational declaration. However, some degree of flexibility remains in the tag and cross-authentication sequence. The cross-authentication sequence defines the satellites “cross-authenticated” by an authenticating Galileo satellite and is one of the main properties of the OSNMA protocol. It allows authenticating nearby Galileo satellites for higher redundancy against losses, authenticating data from satellites not connected to ground and therefore not transmitting OSNMA, and authenticating GPS or other data in the future. It has a significant impact on OSNMA performance: if the sequence is too long, many cross-authenticated satellites will not be seen by the users, limiting the optimal use of the OSNMA bandwidth, and with major impact in TBA (Time Between Authentications) and Time To First Authenticated Fix (TTFAF). If the sequence is too short, several non-connected but visible satellites may remain unauthenticated, also degrading performance. This paper presents an analysis with real SIS data from different cross-authentication sequences transmitted by Galileo over the last months, involving different tag distribution and number of cross-authenticated satellites including open-sky static, dynamic and urban environments. The work will show the degradation with suboptimal cross-authentication sequences and identifies current bottlenecks, proposing some recommendations for future sequences. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sciforum-095088 | Galileo HAS accuracy and convergence performance results |
Show Abstract |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One year after Galileo High Accuracy Service (HAS) Initial Service declaration by the European Commission, this article present Galileo HAS accuracy and convergence comparative performance assessment between two different user algorithm configurations: static and dynamic. The assessment was conducted with two Galileo HAS User Terminal in parallel fed by the same antenna installation to obtain accuracy and convergence for the same period of time. The Galileo HAS User Terminal is a portable and autonomous device powered by a triple-frequency Galileo and GPS receiver and calculates a single (Galileo) or multi-constellation (Galileo + GPS) Galileo HAS using the Performance Characterization User Algorithm developed for the European Union Agency for the Space Programme (EUSPA). The performance assessment is completed with additional analysis in post-processing using a Precise Point Positioning (PPP) engine implementing the same algorithm than the User Terminal fed with International GNSS Service (IGS) stations observables and HAS Internet Data Distribution (IDD) corrections. The analysis is enhanced with an additional postprocessing analysis using the same IGS stations and CNES corrections. Results for static conditions, assuming zero velocity in the Kalman filter, deliver accuracy performance at decimeter level 68% both horizontal and vertical. Results with the dynamic configuration, with a Kalman filter adaptable to changes in user velocity and fit for dynamic applications, indicate slightly over one decimeter 68% both horizontal and vertical. This article also compares both static and dynamic results vs. the Galileo HAS Service Definition Document (SDD) Appendix E typical positioning accuracy performance and presents the convergence time, or time to first precise fix, against positioning horizontal and vertical thresholds. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sciforum-093450 | Analysis of GNSS Signal Correlation in Terrestrial Vehicles |
,
Xurxo Otero Villamide ,
Paolo Crosta
|
Show Abstract |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the reaction of a real-time hardware multicorrelator GNSS receiver in realistic environments. In particular, we investigate how the GNSS signal correlations are distorted in two vehicular scenarios. The scenarios were recorded with a multi-frequency bit grabber and playback in the laboratory. The test campaigns were performed driving in two contrasting propagation environments. Rotterdam downtown was chosen to assess the multipath in challenging urban conditions while Nieuw-Vennep was selected as an open-sky/rural environment. The objective is to characterize the multipath of the received signal using a high-end GNSS receiver able to store 41 correlator outputs. The multipath error is estimated by comparing a local reference of the correlation function, which is estimated by using a GNSS simulator in the absence of GNSS disturbances, to the correlations estimated by the GNSS receiver in the vehicular scenarios. Two methods are considered. The first one consists in computing the error between the reference correlation function and the estimated ones. We evaluate the impact of the multipath on the temporal domain. The second one is based on estimating the multipath by implementing a Non-linear Least Squares estimator. The estimator provides reliable information about the power of the direct and reflected signals. We analyze the differences and similarities between both scenarios for several satellites having different elevations. |
Event Awards
ENC2024 will offer a best paper award.
Each session chair and co-chair will decide the best paper in their session.
Best paper awards for each topic area will be announced during the closing plenary session on 24 May 1300 - 1350.
The Awards
Number of Awards Available: 5
Awarded to the authors of the best paper in each topic area.
TOPIC 1. Algorithms and Methods
TOPIC 2. Multi-Sensor and Autonomous Navigation
TOPIC 3. Safety Critical Navigation
Show all published submissions (21) Hide published submissions (21)
Submissions
List of Papers (21) Toggle list
TOPIC 4. Navigation for the Mass Market
Show all published submissions (9) Hide published submissions (9)
Submissions
List of Papers (9) Toggle list