Introduction
KCTD proteins represent an emerging class of proteins involved in fundamental physio-pathological pathways and pathological states, including neurological and neurodevelopmental processes, cancer, and genetic diseases1-3. In the past decade, we have conducted extensive biochemical/biophysical characterizations of these proteins4-6. However, the lack of structural data prevented a full understanding of their activities at the atomic level.
Methods
Here, by combining experimental (X-ray crystallography) and computational (molecular modeling/dynamics and structure prediction), we have extensively characterized the structural properties of all members of the KCTD family.
Results
Taking advantage of the recent advent of effective predictive approaches based on machine learning techniques (AlphaFold), we recently performed a detailed structural characterization of all members of the KCTD family. First, we demonstrated that the vast majority of these proteins share a structurally similar C-terminal domain despite the absence of sequence similarities. We generated a novel and comprehensive structure-based pseudo-phylogenetic tree that unraveled previously undetected similarities among the family7. A comprehensive analysis of the structural states of functional oligomers of all members of the family led us to identify reliable three-dimensional models8. Finally, we applied this approach to explore, at the atomic level, the Cul3 recognition of all KCTDs9.
Conclusions
Recently developed methodologies for protein structure prediction have made it possible to perform analyses on entire protein families. By combining experimental structural characterizations with effective predictions, we were able to gain insights into the structure of some KCTDs that will hold important implications for their biological function.
1Teng et al. CNS Neurosci.Ther. 2019, 25; 887–902.
2Angrisani et al. Cell.Commun. Signal. 2021; 19, 56.
3Raymundo et al. J.Clin.Investig. 2023; e174138.
4Balasco et al. Biochim.Biophys.Acta 2014;1844(7):1289-98.
5Smaldone et al. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126808.
6Balasco et al. Biomolecules. 2019;9(8):323.
7Esposito et al. Biomolecules. 2021;11(12):1862.
8Esposito et al. Int.J.Mol.Sci. 2022;23(21):13346.
9Balasco et al. Int.J.Mol.Sci. 2024;25(3):1881.