Please login first
Environmental Assessment and Ecotoxicity of Paper Coated with PHBV and Cellulose: Uncovering Hidden Risks in “Sustainable” Packaging
* 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 3, 4 , 1 , 1
1  Polymers and Advanced Materials Group (PIMA), Universitat Jaume I (UJI), Avenida de Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, (Spain)
2  Environmental and Water Chemistry for Human Health (ONHEALTH), Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA)-CSIC, Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona (Spain)
3  Novel Materials and Nanotechnology Group, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA), Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), Calle Catedrático Agustín Escardino Benlloch 7, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain
4  Bioinicia R&D Department, Bioinicia S.L., Calle Algepser 65, 46980 Paterna, Spain
Academic Editor: Valentina Siracusa

Abstract:

The growing demand for sustainable packaging has accelerated the development of biodegradable, bio-based alternatives to traditional plastics. Among these, PHBV and cellulose-coated paper are promising due to their compostability and renewable origin. However, their environmental safety remains uncertain, especially considering the possible release of chemical additives—such as organophosphate esters (OPEs), phthalates, and alternative plasticisers—during degradation. These substances may pose ecotoxicological risks to soil organisms and ecosystems. This study evaluates the environmental performance of a commercial PHBV–cellulose coated paper (BIOFUNPAPER) by assessing its degradation and ecotoxicity under composting conditions.

Four composting reactors were operated at 58 °C for 90 days with 1.7 kg of compost each. At 30, 60, and 90 days, 25 g samples were collected and analysed by HPLC‑MS to quantify 20 OPEs, 11 phthalates, and 4 alternative plasticisers. Parallel bioassays were conducted on earthworms (Eisenia fetida), oat and tomato plants, and soil microbes. Parameters included germination, biomass, worm survival, reproduction, and nitrification inhibition.

The results showed 60% biodegradation of the BIOFUNPAPER material. Acute toxicity in worms was negligible; however, chronic exposure resulted in a 50% reduction in reproduction and a 33% reduction in biomass. Plant germination exceeded 90%, yet tomato biomass fell to 68% of control levels. Microbial nitrification activity dropped to 79.8%, just below the ISO safety threshold. Most additive concentrations decreased over time but were detectable throughout.

The findings indicate that, despite effective degradation and low acute toxicity, chronic ecological effects persist. These outcomes highlight the need to go beyond biodegradability assessments and integrate ecotoxicological evaluations of additives and by-products. Ensuring the environmental compatibility of new bio-based packaging materials requires a holistic, lifecycle-based approach to support a truly circular and safe packaging system.

Acknowledgements:

Project CPP2021-008973 funded by MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union NextGenerationEU/ PRTR.

Keywords: Biodegradation, ecotoxicity, biodegradable packaging, plasticisers, environmental impact
Comments on this paper
Currently there are no comments available.


 
 
Top