Please login first
Tuning the viscoelastic properties of hydrogels to mimic prostatic cancer microenvironment
* 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 3 , 1
1  Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta", Polytechnic University of Milan, Milan, 20133, Italy
2  Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, 10126, Italy
3  Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy
4  Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, 50134, Italy
Academic Editor: SIDI A. BENCHERIF

Abstract:

Introduction
Three-dimensional hydrogels are increasingly being proposed1 to mimic biological tissues and micromechanical environments, owing to their tunability. Understanding structure–composition relationships is crucial for tailoring their properties. A prostate cancer (PCa) model was developed using an internally crosslinked2 alginate/gelatin hydrogel, designed to mimic the micromechanical environment and optimized for bioprinting with human PCa cells.

Methods
Hydrogels were prepared by sequentially mixing solutions/suspensions in 22Rv1 culture medium (final composition of 2% w/v gelatin, 6% w/v alginate, 0.7% w/v CaCO3, 3.74% w/v GDL, and 3x106 22Rv1 cells/ml). Hydrogels were then covered with an equal volume of buffered medium. Frequency sweep tests were performed at 20–0.1 Hz at 20 °C, 37 °C, and 50 °C using a rotational rheometer. Gelation time was evaluated by time sweep tests.

Results
The hydrogel formed a semi-IPN showing in frequency sweep tests higher G’’ at 20 °C and no G’ variations upon temperature changes. The timing of the medium addition (tadd) was used to control the viscoelastic properties. At 37 °C, 24 h after crosslinking onset, with tadd of 60 min, G’ reached 5.5 kPa (at 1.05 Hz), within the PCa stiffness range (5–10 kPa)3, and G’’ was 240 Pa. Printability was a priori assessed by rheological analyses and then with a pneumatic 3D bioprinter2,4. The best performance (printability coefficient 1.17) was obtained 30 min after crosslinking onset, with a 25G conical nozzle, 10 mm/s speed, and 70 kPa pressure. After 72 h, cell viability and metabolic activity increased compared to 1 h incubation (slightly below 2- and 1.5-fold, respectively). The initial pH (~6.5) gradually reached neutrality within 2 h (tadd 60 min; one medium change after 1 h).

Conclusions
Our study shows how composition and experimental parameters influence the properties of an alginate/gelatin hydrogel, providing a versatile approach for advanced 3D models and other hydrogel-based systems.

Keywords: Hydrogels; 3D models; 3D printing; Rheology; Bioinks; Biomaterials; Gels; 3D microenvironments
Comments on this paper
Currently there are no comments available.


 
 
Top