Introduction – The dissemination of fictional content about criminal investigations across various platforms has led to the creation of the “CSI effect,” inflating public expectations and shaping misconceptions about forensic science. This study investigates whether targeted, narrative-driven workshops demonstrating the role of technologies in criminal investigations can counteract these unrealistic expectations and foster accurate technological literacy.
Methods – Two sequential workshops were delivered to adult learners. Workshop 1 focused on the application of data science techniques such as web-scraping and data visualization in criminal investigations alongside their ethical implications. Similarly, workshop 2 introduced artificial intelligence techniques and three-dimensional crime scene reconstruction within an immersive virtual environment. Both sessions employed interactive, scenario-based activities and encouraged participants to apply concepts to simulated investigative cases. Pre- and post-workshop surveys measured changes in participants’ perceived understanding of forensic technologies, critical thinking confidence, and attitudes toward forensic realism. Feedback was collected through question–answer sessions and open-ended questionnaire items.
Results – Post-workshop responses indicated a significant increase in accurate knowledge of demonstrated AI-driven technologies and a reduction in exaggerated expectations of forensic speed and certainty. Participants highlighted the value of customized content, hands-on interaction, and narrative framing. The format aligned with andragogical principles, leveraging prior experience and promoting self-directed learning, which participants reported as enhancing relevance and retention.
Conclusions – Narrative-centric, interactive workshops effectively mitigate the CSI effect by improving technological literacy, ethical awareness, and realistic expectations among adult learners. Integrating these pedagogical strategies into forensic education and public outreach can strengthen science communication and promote informed discourse on the capabilities and limits of modern crime-investigation technologies.
