Public–Private Partnership (PPP) approaches have developed as vital catalysts fostering sustainable development goals (SDGs), particularly in industrial, energy, and social sectors. These partnerships act as a boost for both sectors: integrating advanced and efficient practices used in the private sector with the effective and powerful outreach of the public sector. However, the management dynamics required to support this partnership often remain unexplored. Therefore, this paper intends to explore the managerial challenges related to PPPs, mainly focusing on how the governing roles, strategic timelines, and stakeholder information exchanges come together to create successful and sustainable results in the long run.
This study demonstrates a comparative case among three Indian PPP projects, such as smart city infrastructure, renewable energy parks, and urban transport systems. Vital entities like government officers, project managers, and private sector executives were interviewed (semi-structurally). The data were then examined using managerial process mapping and thematic coding.
Finally, this analysis explored the effectiveness of PPPs, and it depends on public sector roles, detailed agreements based on performance, mutual bonding and trust, and adaptable-dynamic project management. Significant issues like governmental delays, political influences, and disproportionate responsibilities in risk management are identified. However, it was observed that projects involving voluntary planning, digital monitoring, and transparent processes expedited better performance with higher sustainability.
Therefore, carefully governed PPPs can become vital tools for sustainable development. The managerial responsibilities, like better cross-sector communication, reliability, flexibility, and transparency, play a major role in overcoming traditional inequalities and producing effective and sustainable solutions. The case study effectively contributes to the development of better PPPs closely aligned with ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) priorities.