Please login first
Effect of The Form of The Error Correlation Functions on The Uncertainty in The Estimation of Atmospheric Aerosol Distribution When Using Spatial–Temporal Optimal Interpolation
* , ,
1  Center of Optical Remote Sensing, Institute of Physics of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, 220072 Nezalezhnasti Ave., 68-2, Belarus
Academic Editor: Riccardo Buccolieri

Abstract:

A common approach to estimate the spatial–temporal distribution of atmospheric species properties is data assimilation. This comprises methods to combine information from different sources for obtaining the best estimate of a system state. Data assimilation is based on minimizing the error in the estimate (optimal interpolation and Kalman filtering methods) or on minimizing the cost function (variational methods). Under certain conditions, variational methods turn out to be equivalent to optimal interpolation or Kalman filtering. All data assimilation techniques require an understanding of data error statistics. Optimal interpolation is a relatively simple and computationally cheap non-sequential method. In the optimal interpolation method, error correlations can be modeled with analytical functions on the base of the gathered data. In the present work, we investigate the effect of the form of the error correlation functions on the uncertainty in the estimate when using the spatial–temporal optimal interpolation (STOI) technique. We apply STOI to the estimation of aerosol distribution over Europe. To perform STOI, we use results of the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem simulations, as well as observations from a ground-based radiometric network AERONET that provides data on aerosol properties with low uncertainty. We show that the results of the STOI estimation are very tentative to the form of the error correlation functions. We perform some tuning of the correlation function parameters to improve the accuracy of the estimation.

Keywords: data assimilation; spatial-temporal optimal interpolation; atmospheric aerosol
Comments on this paper
Gennadii Milinevskyi
At least one report that does not use machine learning but can serve to verify the results of using machine learning. Great job!
Natallia Miatselskaya
Thank you for your opinion!




 
 
Top