Previous Article in event
Natural and Artificial Methods of Heat Resource Regeneration in Underground Thermal Energy Storages with Borehole Heat ExchangersPrevious Article in session
Next Article in event
Sustainable Energy Consumption with Load Shape Characterization of Unmetered Food Vendors in a Campus Cafeteria ComplexNext Article in session
Missing Data, Moral Eyesores, and Marginalized People: Opposition to Needle Exchange and Harm Reduction in Drug Policy
Published: 03 November 2014 by MDPI in The 4th World Sustainability Forum session Sustainability of Culture and Heritage
Abstract: A critical component of "sustainability" is the capacity to manage chronic social problems like addiction. Sociologists, anthropologists, historians, and other social scientists are invested in debates over substance abuse treatment. This study weds those engagements through an overview of past and current critiques of the twelve-step model, primarily Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), and evaluation of the efficacy of AA vis-à-vis other addiction therapies, including inpatient rehab centers and individual "sobriety coaches," among others. Though attacked by varying interests, from for-profit recovery services to even religious skeptics, AA remains among the most successful voluntary addiction treatment programs. This paper also questions why certain groups enjoy higher rates of lasting sobriety than others, with particular attention to gender, race, religion, and compulsory-versus-voluntary participation.
Keywords: Addiction; Twelve-Step Programs; Alcoholics Anonymous; alcoholism; recovery industry