The definition of more realistic scenarios of instances for the portfolio selection problems (PSP) of new product developments usually should involve precedence relations that generate effects related to time-interdependence among different projects. The study of time -interdependences, or time effects, on the selection of projects captures our attention because they affect the problem objective functions. Three different moments have been identified as usually present in any project: 1) the estimated completion time; 2) the moment in which the competence become significant; and, 3) the moment in which the developed product becomes old. A PSP under such temporal constraints (denoted PSPTC) could face risk because the lack of reliable data derived from long lead times of projects, or by a complex market and technology dynamics; such imperfect knowledge could cause variability in the benefits and requirements of a PSPTC. In this sense, this paper proposes the design of an optimization model for PSPTC under uncertainty, and the study of their influence in choosing optimal project portfolios of new product developments. This work proposes an interval-based approach to deal with PSPTC; this approach has the advantage of a unified and simple way to model the different sources of imprecision, uncertainty and arbitrariness. Also, the model is parametrized such that the attitude of the DM facing the imperfect knowledge can be adjusted by using two meaningful parameters.
References
1. Balderas, F., Fernandez, E., Gomez, C., & Cruz-Reyes, L. (2016). Metaheuristic robust optimization of project portfolios using an interval-based model of imprecisions. International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics, 7 (3), 101-118. Retrieved from https://www.ijcopi.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/32.
2. Carlsson, C., Fuller, R., Heikkila, M., & Majlender, P. (2007). A fuzzy approach to R&D portfolio selection. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 44(2), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2006.07.003.
3. Fliedner, T., & Liesio, J. (2016). Adjustable robustness for multi-attribute project portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 252, 931-946. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.058.
4. Hasuike, T., Katagiri, H., & Ishii, H. (2009). Portfolio selection problems with random fuzzy variable returns. Fuzzy Sets and systems, 160(18), 2579-2596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2008.11.010.
5. Ke, H., & Liu, B. (2007). Project scheduling problem with mixed uncertainty of randomness and fuzziness. European Journal of Operational Research, 183 (1), 135-147. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.055.
6. Liesio, J., Mild, P. & Salo, A. (2007). Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(3), 1488-1505. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.12.041.
7. Liesio, J., Mild, P., & Salo, A. (2008). Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. European Journal of Operational Research, 190(3), 679-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.049.
8. Medaglia, A.L., Graves, S.B., & Ringuest, J.L. (2007). A multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 179, 869-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.068.
9. Rabbani, M., Bajestani, M. A. & Khoshkhou, G. B. (2010). A multi-objective particle swarm optimization for project selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.056.
10. Toppila, A., & Salo, A. (2017). Binary decision diagrams for generating and storing non-dominated project portfolios with interval-valued project scores. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(1), 244-254. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.019.